From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Fix dma-buf attachment leak in xe_gem_prime_import()
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:04:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adXh7FdAxseknVxX@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260407201542.3396317-5-shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 08:15:42PM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> When xe_dma_buf_init_obj() fails, the attachment from
> dma_buf_dynamic_attach() is not detached. Add dma_buf_detach() before
> returning the error. Note: we cannot use goto out_err here because
> xe_dma_buf_init_obj() already frees bo on failure, and out_err would
> double-free it.
>
> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> index 24d9d82426b9..7702a6bdaae5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> @@ -370,12 +370,15 @@ struct drm_gem_object *xe_gem_prime_import(struct drm_device *dev,
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> - /* Errors here will take care of freeing the bo. */
> + /*
> + * xe_dma_buf_init_obj() takes ownership of bo on both success
> + * and failure, so we must not touch bo after this call.
> + */
> obj = xe_dma_buf_init_obj(dev, bo, dma_buf);
> - if (IS_ERR(obj))
> + if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
> + dma_buf_detach(dma_buf, attach);
Based on my feedback from the previous patch [1], I think we also want...
xe_bo_free(bo);
Also unseen in this diff is this code:
365 attach = dma_buf_dynamic_attach(dma_buf, dev->dev, attach_ops, &bo->ttm.base);
366 if (IS_ERR(attach)) {
367 obj = ERR_CAST(attach);
368 goto out_err;
369 }
We also need a xe_bo_free(bo) in this failures if statement.
Matt
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/716820/?series=164476&rev=1#comment_1319810
> return obj;
> -
> -
> + }
> get_dma_buf(dma_buf);
> obj->import_attach = attach;
> return obj;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260407201542.3396317-1-shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
2026-04-07 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix bo leak on unaligned size validation in xe_bo_init_locked() Shuicheng Lin
2026-04-08 4:52 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-07 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix bo leak on GGTT flag " Shuicheng Lin
2026-04-08 4:54 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-07 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Fix bo leak in xe_dma_buf_init_obj() on allocation failure Shuicheng Lin
2026-04-08 5:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-07 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Fix dma-buf attachment leak in xe_gem_prime_import() Shuicheng Lin
2026-04-08 5:04 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adXh7FdAxseknVxX@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox