From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: fix initialization of tags of the huge zero folio with init_on_free
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:32:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeiivYFfC_EfGuFC@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421-zerotags-v2-1-05cb1035482e@kernel.org>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 05:39:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> __GFP_ZEROTAGS semantics are currently a bit weird, but effectively this
> flag is only ever set alongside __GFP_ZERO and __GFP_SKIP_KASAN.
>
> If we run with init_on_free, we will zero out pages during
> __free_pages_prepare(), to skip zeroing on the allocation path.
>
> However, when allocating with __GFP_ZEROTAG set, post_alloc_hook() will
> consequently not only skip clearing page content, but also skip
> clearing tag memory.
>
> Not clearing tags through __GFP_ZEROTAGS is irrelevant for most pages that
> will get mapped to user space through set_pte_at() later: set_pte_at() and
> friends will detect that the tags have not been initialized yet
> (PG_mte_tagged not set), and initialize them.
>
> However, for the huge zero folio, which will be mapped through a PMD
> marked as special, this initialization will not be performed, ending up
> exposing whatever tags were still set for the pages.
>
> The docs (Documentation/arch/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst) state
> that allocation tags are set to 0 when a page is first mapped to user
> space. That no longer holds with the huge zero folio when init_on_free
> is enabled.
>
> Fix it by decoupling __GFP_ZEROTAGS from __GFP_ZERO, passing to
> tag_clear_highpages() whether we want to also clear page content.
>
> Invert the meaning of the tag_clear_highpages() return value to have
> clearer semantics.
>
> Reproduced with the huge zero folio by modifying the check_buffer_fill
> arm64/mte selftest to use a 2 MiB area, after making sure that pages have
> a non-0 tag set when freeing (note that, during boot, we will not
> actually initialize tags, but only set KASAN_TAG_KERNEL in the page
> flags).
>
> $ ./check_buffer_fill
> 1..20
> ...
> not ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
> not ok 18 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> ...
>
> This code needs more cleanups; we'll tackle that next, like
> decoupling __GFP_ZEROTAGS from __GFP_SKIP_KASAN.
>
> Fixes: adfb6609c680 ("mm/huge_memory: initialise the tags of the huge zero folio")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
The logic looks fine to me. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 15:39 [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: fix initialization of tags of the huge zero folio with init_on_free David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-22 2:47 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-22 7:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-22 10:32 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeiivYFfC_EfGuFC@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox