From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B583FB7F1 for ; Fri, 8 May 2026 20:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778271262; cv=none; b=j5IDhIMLwohUOVOT2SXuZSfHhRopsLIUuSnIGDo9sqUACWAaIN1FE7zHUOV8X31VnhlH9PITgSCI9JppAt83IvrlKP8GIi5CWcFoREkS02vm0+jRqpFa1XmSzRdQgaTpvHfb2V9ZXVLzNMMKR/Iuoru7MrqrrbuckJZR5QO3yac= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778271262; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vJz4MyRRqHz69E66/O5kDd7yLuLDgBnoNU4QmBDbKH8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=P5ypWJG+JJ2eDWOV5McuRs8XD4yLIT7XXxvbwkANmDaRC63vuuI651F2QQ/PNQJFsdA1BZbwJW9UqedhOw315/61LZIRed8gU7QWtc+RtFXBHn4/6fVF0eN1+flvSQV5qvDvyNQaXYgLOuLJyN4QxNPFiPf7Bkk1htEWPLAnOeM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X0HPuCH3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X0HPuCH3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E562BC2BCB0; Fri, 8 May 2026 20:14:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778271262; bh=vJz4MyRRqHz69E66/O5kDd7yLuLDgBnoNU4QmBDbKH8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=X0HPuCH3VKSVAgYNq1BiEMopDgkpml7Z3vYl/cl6W3NQI8Dz1qCUJBil/Xn67GTB2 D3/AsCHQR0pflmpQiuZCoM9M3WZCe8pL990tH4+zAtLjdRNi7wO4w41MDZEObfQo6H +rpG6aRDjlatM7fDFcnDcdtWhi7E618AHM8ubUG1faVgbGsFUM5/+zKEthpOvXYG8y U8QcO93G8dTTph3UNeretPLCP71m14CKowSEgk4fsqu4UcmdrXn8zGezKRgA44bxH9 Qmv+q9FERQUzEsAevbr0GoFpkX5Ht8yT85GhfNW4/9hgAAE6FSCIdlFMdsB+mJJUBu BZLnNNbNb+L2w== Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 22:14:19 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] pwm: imx-tpm: Count the number of enabled channels in probe" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Message-ID: References: <2026050332-washer-legislate-ef0e@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g7bl57fqxct5su22" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2026050332-washer-legislate-ef0e@gregkh> --g7bl57fqxct5su22 Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] pwm: imx-tpm: Count the number of enabled channels in probe" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello Greg, On Sun, May 03, 2026 at 01:46:32PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >=20 > The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . >=20 > To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following command= s: >=20 > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.gi= t/ linux-6.1.y > git checkout FETCH_HEAD > git cherry-pick -x 3962c24f2d14e8a7f8a23f56b7ce320523947342 > # > git commit -s > git send-email --to '' --in-reply-to '2026050332-= washer-legislate-ef0e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. >=20 You wrote already on 2026-05-03 about this patch that failed to apply to 6.6, 6.1, 5.15 and 5.10. I replied to the 6.6 one with the exact patch that Sasha now recreated in reply to this new 6.1 failure. I would have expected that the 6.6 backport is tried to be applied to 6.1 and the other older versions given the mainline original doesn't apply cleanly. :-( that this resulted in duplicate work being done Uwe --g7bl57fqxct5su22 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmn+RBgACgkQj4D7WH0S /k5ZTgf8CXXgMtIvbo5N0m2GVWxyhTqaJCmLFB+vEFwfEvuq6MfyuiZcOYjema+4 UgYmL9scgOZwx+WiTnYhQu+QFNRJDInzjz5ZK+KfvKGOOq5XnT7WH57JsWv4pS1C s7+A8F6wngopTMTpIUE6iPZDo7ccXhg9duHm6QZy1GbypJuq4xnWJIqZ6eER33gb YQ2/yGgu1GPUa+WB+uTkEfiWfwz/uqZ7y6OujDxJANTSJRN1QA/ywLuTbhx4xAjY bwFROBivx/kRLoYuodO8WFjo27WtAes+tR2EfWybMpvImWegRipvqYyuew5qHxYW f2tkyeCFW9qfXoD1gBosptWSm7Dgbg== =ke9W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --g7bl57fqxct5su22--