From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <vdubeyko@redhat.com>
To: Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>,
syzbot+217eb327242d08197efb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] hfs/hfsplus: initialize data buffer in hfs_bnode_read_u16 and hfs_bnode_read_u8
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 16:29:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af5d510b2204484b414474c5b92c8654908c4db3.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260501110218.29906-2-tristmd@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2026-05-01 at 11:02 +0000, Tristan Madani wrote:
> From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
>
> hfs_bnode_read_u16() and hfs_bnode_read_u8() declare local data buffers
> without initialization, then pass them to hfs_bnode_read(). If
> is_bnode_offset_valid() fails inside hfs_bnode_read(), the function
> returns early without writing to the buffer, leaving it uninitialized.
> The caller then returns the garbage value to its caller.
>
> This triggers KMSAN uninit-value reports when a corrupted HFS+ image
> has a node_size of 1, causing rec_off to underflow in hfs_bnode_find()
> and the subsequent hfs_bnode_read_u16() to operate on an invalid offset.
>
> Zero-initialize both buffers so that callers get a deterministic zero
> value when the underlying read fails.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+217eb327242d08197efb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=217eb327242d08197efb
> Tested-by: syzbot+217eb327242d08197efb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: a431930c9bac ("hfs: fix slab-out-of-bounds in hfs_bnode_read()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
> ---
> fs/hfs/bnode.c | 4 ++--
> fs/hfsplus/bnode.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/bnode.c b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> index c00645a4a5733..08307faea7a68 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void hfs_bnode_read(struct hfs_bnode *node, void *buf, u32 off, u32 len)
>
> u16 hfs_bnode_read_u16(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
> {
> - __be16 data;
> + __be16 data = 0;
> // optimize later...
> hfs_bnode_read(node, &data, off, 2);
> return be16_to_cpu(data);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ u16 hfs_bnode_read_u16(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
>
> u8 hfs_bnode_read_u8(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
> {
> - u8 data;
> + u8 data = 0;
> // optimize later...
> hfs_bnode_read(node, &data, off, 1);
> return data;
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c b/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> index f8b5a8ae58ff5..35790085b5b2e 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ void hfs_bnode_read(struct hfs_bnode *node, void *buf, u32 off, u32 len)
>
> u16 hfs_bnode_read_u16(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
> {
> - __be16 data;
> + __be16 data = 0;
> /* TODO: optimize later... */
> hfs_bnode_read(node, &data, off, 2);
> return be16_to_cpu(data);
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ u16 hfs_bnode_read_u16(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
>
> u8 hfs_bnode_read_u8(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
> {
> - u8 data;
> + u8 data = 0;
> /* TODO: optimize later... */
> hfs_bnode_read(node, &data, off, 1);
> return data;
If I remember correctly, I already shared that hfs_bnode_read() is called in
multiple places. So, this patch is not enough for complete fix of the issue.
Thanks,
Slava.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 11:02 [PATCH 1/3] hfs/hfsplus: fix u32 overflow in check_and_correct_requested_length Tristan Madani
2026-05-01 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] hfs/hfsplus: initialize data buffer in hfs_bnode_read_u16 and hfs_bnode_read_u8 Tristan Madani
2026-05-04 23:29 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2026-05-01 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] hfsplus: fix null pointer dereference in hfsplus_create_attributes_file Tristan Madani
2026-05-04 23:31 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-05-04 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] hfs/hfsplus: fix u32 overflow in check_and_correct_requested_length Viacheslav Dubeyko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af5d510b2204484b414474c5b92c8654908c4db3.camel@redhat.com \
--to=vdubeyko@redhat.com \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+217eb327242d08197efb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tristan@talencesecurity.com \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox