From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 263433DDDB1; Wed, 6 May 2026 09:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778060387; cv=none; b=CkWt9ONK2FegATPBVS4TLi3p3F4iNJpYsWR8t1vEIXafh/zEovn9ElckfSEnB91jTRuaDyzY0qpNOsdxhp+orG6iUIe0wgUOYyt4JQcjMJ1S2BWUv40Sgl0xbrTXrpBmcB/ZJClGCkYFCS1m+4SpOBbw2K7Mo57Lc72Dpu4Ydhc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778060387; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h6m+ghxy1h/+irv9PhRDK5japHTZ6CbKeeqCDu05sk0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LII3cUOKvAHw/AbJO1K0sx6vV2S5dVZHkN4plRRuyQNxjw8d60Z3DpwoeTeRvHq4r1UWdjPzIbqfDmztb2B7BP5lm2kT/PhDgEVHguXMQNUl+asPURHifkk0lG66G1J6wt9ZkdEB8bKrVkJoWWJWLDmYrK44mqrRDMb8G2ME2rU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=C944XhX5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="C944XhX5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ilqncLxDv9KwHIALy4qNC3lzSPjPqxEqi2WTd/zHXvM=; b=C944XhX5N46zrMKMCe9vRGJC/y OpdvtAVav6O/qyUK7My0USCXKXAgqXD9mynBb7NhldKKHyCe0jJG9rELqCKlrofdMuj19qSyl58qW rKnxyK8hmi5aCnn4TLzniSkGylIhMnomXBHPfcBAHPsVOP/215d17gtkYRzUSdrumPF/cgnf7cSbr wQ/UU8EIDo6EU4sKx1F7ZVfgSiLPYLHKvGUfIrm6xpyuMrHOQpcin7XeCJxDvzvry/ffunkQANf6A lF0XtPLOeoiqZE754D6jHtaxY752S6b6BboOyuFjgUW0GalEzE70knaMMbz66cxJKbgNmzVIkz8JZ AHeICD6Q==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wKYj5-003UrJ-0J; Wed, 06 May 2026 09:39:31 +0000 Received: by eldamar.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1354BE2EE7; Wed, 06 May 2026 11:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 11:39:29 +0200 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso To: Jiayuan Chen , 1135514@bugs.debian.org Cc: Paolo Abeni , Sasha Levin , regressions@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, podorski , Brad Barnett , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman Subject: Re: Bug#1135514: [6.1.y regresssion] 9a95ec9144ee ("xfrm: fix ip_rt_bug race in icmp_route_lookup reverse path") causes log spam on ping to unreachable host Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Jiayuan Chen , 1135514@bugs.debian.org, Paolo Abeni , Sasha Levin , regressions@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, podorski , Brad Barnett , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman References: <177771348699.1898023.16904466444228860838@eldamar.lan> <177768508393.32886.13183514325428485879.reportbug@pjp3.podorski.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Debian-User: carnil Hi Jiayuan, On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 09:04:24AM +0800, Jiayuan Chen wrote: > I think it because we failed to backport this patch before: > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250207161555-b1a8749027831a1a@stable.kernel.org/T/#m0c880c1f04f7211aea9b7f6b4de0b64aa1726417 Which won't apply cleanly, I assume this was the reason it got not backported to 6.1.y. Do you have a backport of that, or should the original commit introducing the issue be reverted from 6.1.y? Regards, Salvtore