From: Pavel Machek <pavel@nabladev.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@monom.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org,
nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90@mail.toshiba, pavel@nabladev.com,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM: stable backports
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 10:00:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agLeMIrCfFVypBav@duo.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511135357.2786242-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 805 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is a backport of ARM related fixes. This applies cleanly to v6.18
> and v6.12. I have an updated batch for v6.6 and v6.1 because this does
> not apply cleanly.
>
> #1 and #2 are prerequisites for #3.
People often use stable-dep-of: header for that.
> Can't tell the origin of #3 (fix hash_name() fault). It might be there
> since the begin of time.
>
> #4 (fix branch predictor hardening) fixes commit f5fe12b1eaee2 ("ARM:
> spectre-v2: harden user aborts in kernel space") which is v4.20-rc2.
>
> If there are no objections I would post the v6.6 version once this is
> accepted and then rebase the PREEMPT_RT bits on top of this.
I don't see anything obviously wrong with the series.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@nabladev.com>
Best regards,
Pavel
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 13:53 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: stable backports Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-11 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: group is_permission_fault() with is_translation_fault() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-11 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: allow __do_kernel_fault() to report execution of memory faults Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-11 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: fix hash_name() fault Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-11 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: fix branch predictor hardening Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-12 8:00 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2026-05-13 13:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM: stable backports Bryan Brattlof
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agLeMIrCfFVypBav@duo.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@nabladev.com \
--cc=bb@ti.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner@monom.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90@mail.toshiba \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox