Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
	 Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kho: fix order calculation for kho_unpreserve_pages()
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 14:13:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agxv3w--GPrc85De@plex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519133332.2498092-1-pratyush@kernel.org>

On 05-19 15:33, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> From: "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" <pratyush@kernel.org>
> 
> Commit 91e74fa8b1bc ("kho: make sure preservations do not span multiple
> NUMA nodes") made sure preservations from kho_preserve_pages() do not
> span multiple NUMA nodes. If they do, the order is reduced and tried
> again.
> 
> The same logic was not implemented for kho_unpreserve_pages(). This can
> result in unpreserve calculating a different order than preserve, and
> thus not actually unpreserving the pages.
> 
> Fix this by moving the order calculation logic to
> __kho_preserve_pages_order() and use it from both preserve and
> unpreserve paths.
> 
> Move __kho_unpreserve() down to avoid having a forward declaration. Its
> users are further down in the file anyway. Also, it results in grouping
> for all the page-level preservation and unpreservation functions. This
> unfortunately makes the diff hard to read, but the main change in
> __kho_unpreserve() is to call __kho_preserve_pages_order() instead of
> open-coding the order calculation.
> 
> Fixes: 91e74fa8b1bc ("kho: make sure preservations do not span multiple NUMA nodes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> 

Pasha

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-19 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-19 13:33 [PATCH] kho: fix order calculation for kho_unpreserve_pages() Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-19 14:13 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2026-05-19 18:47 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-20  5:09 ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agxv3w--GPrc85De@plex \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox