From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE2A39D3C1; Fri, 22 May 2026 13:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779455606; cv=none; b=DicnG6Ff+qpFLXijBA9J23j7rllzxz63oIym0qVIezXHXf6JLh50ED3AXp2dnaA/0JT9Eb+A/MjqpiSesB+w6CgFyvXiIDp+WwkaqcboS6UjKSe+3ocUtSlv/NbiTTN/TmoF0WB9XvdKX+KILe74lLLylAPdN7StoDVVn1GKWso= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779455606; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XGUCGxnEA4kj79DA+8/vsKuNs1lZvHw/84Eetaa9NPI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GyBawXRnRtVXQ+PKMjBlUGDBjJMAPweiGVhgOkzIxaoGxlxajBWiv9kM4rA/OBceXiTCwpziQjxGZU9ShgSognlZ1+zqISMfiLsOf1Z8QrQGE4tqOyXxUT3Opxy7L0B11pZUmR8bwCxvFRiJHLwAKp/LkhsCkhkcjsTW76YuhQk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hX9VqTDl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hX9VqTDl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1779455603; x=1810991603; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=XGUCGxnEA4kj79DA+8/vsKuNs1lZvHw/84Eetaa9NPI=; b=hX9VqTDlscuAD/lg3qzifERxVaOfFQWF0LM6IpV8aVY1R/iMBAKKgKxL SFB0TzMv4FgWRZf5TQlnqEpIqvEqMlxXl/Rl/VPOwcc2TXZmCxcB0DSkJ 3iWvZ+KVG+HxPmmU+3m2KX6YpIpGHAwCTcxBYLOALlIqfG6KHsVjPehUO 6hYOB4+4Rhkf/10O2dlpp0sn4FZrL2go3KlVgFiraPKG+gUoivvhKrbSD ubgkGY2tuwJG3CxRyAvqVkblGHKQh6dYZy74cplN2nv+Q8gP8ClRyMdiH ANh8Gdft6iD+bXua0OACaj88xuD9TjBV0qp3RThx9SA7/ffePak8be5Qp A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6E+wUM3TQyWEjlrTn3W64w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zqFhqZWCT/mOxPWggMLysQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11794"; a="80353687" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,162,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="80353687" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2026 06:13:21 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HFH30V+WS5O0kcta+kn0sw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FB9kCSnSRSmU+NtgPu13lQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,162,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="236689704" Received: from amilburn-desk.amilburn-desk (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.187]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2026 06:13:18 -0700 Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:13:15 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: Icenowy Zheng , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Sam Ravnborg , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Icenowy Zheng , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/client: check whether CRTC is active before waiting for vblank Message-ID: References: <20260519092420.1124348-1-zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Finland On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 01:55:59PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 19.05.26 um 11:24 schrieb Icenowy Zheng: > > Currently the implementaion of drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank() > > assumes drm_vblank_get() will fail when the CRTC isn't active. However > > it seems that this is not true, and running fbcon on a device with the > > first CRTC inactive will lead to kernel warning in some cases (which > > could be reproduced with the loongson driver). > > > > Change the implementation to add a check for the active state (atomic) / > > enabled state (non-atomic) before calling drm_vblank_get(). As the > > assumption of drm_vblank_get() failing for inactive CRTC isn't met, the > > error status of drm_vblank_get() can now be exported too. > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Fixes: d8c4bddcd8bc ("drm/fb-helper: Synchronize dirty worker with vblank") > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > > index bb49b8361271a..1b03bf351256e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > > @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ int drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned i > > { > > struct drm_device *dev = client->dev; > > struct drm_crtc *crtc; > > - int ret; > > + int ret = 0; > > > > /* > > * Rate-limit update frequency to vblank. If there's a DRM master > > @@ -1326,15 +1326,24 @@ int drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned i > > * Only wait for a vblank event if the CRTC is enabled, otherwise > > * just don't do anything, not even report an error. > > */ > > + if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev)) { > > + if (!crtc->state || !crtc->state->active) > > + goto out; > > + } else { > > + if (!crtc->enabled) > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > This part is good. Locking is missing. > > > ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc); > > if (!ret) { > > drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(crtc); > > drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc); > > } > > > > +out: > > drm_master_internal_release(dev); > > > > - return 0; > > + return ret; > > But this isn't. There can be CRTCs without any vblank at all. We still > want to fail silently for them. So we still have to return 0 here. > > Having set this, fixing this helper is only partially what you want. > Since your device has vblanking, the emulation should check on the > correct CRTC. IOW you need to pass the right CRTC index at > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c#L237 > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c#L920 > > I'm not quite sure how to support this. The CRTC is under > fb_helper->client.modesets.crtc. You'd have to figure out which is the > relevant one and use that. But that's also not so great, as fbdev ioctls > only support CRTC 0. Doing internal re-mappings only complicates matters. > > But why does your HW use CRTC 1 in the first place. Could be eg. the enabled outputs can't be driven with CRTC 0. I guess what you want to do is pick the first crtc from modesets[] which is enabled. Or perhaps even "pick the Nth enabled crtc from modesets[] based on the ioctl argument". -- Ville Syrjälä Intel