From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/client: check whether CRTC is active before waiting for vblank
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:28:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahBZ8nIqR4qESLZg@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4b2e8cb-dd7c-42c2-88b7-0a2ab95a90ee@suse.de>
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 22.05.26 um 15:13 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 01:55:59PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Am 19.05.26 um 11:24 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> >>> Currently the implementaion of drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank()
> >>> assumes drm_vblank_get() will fail when the CRTC isn't active. However
> >>> it seems that this is not true, and running fbcon on a device with the
> >>> first CRTC inactive will lead to kernel warning in some cases (which
> >>> could be reproduced with the loongson driver).
> >>>
> >>> Change the implementation to add a check for the active state (atomic) /
> >>> enabled state (non-atomic) before calling drm_vblank_get(). As the
> >>> assumption of drm_vblank_get() failing for inactive CRTC isn't met, the
> >>> error status of drm_vblank_get() can now be exported too.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >>> Fixes: d8c4bddcd8bc ("drm/fb-helper: Synchronize dirty worker with vblank")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> >>> index bb49b8361271a..1b03bf351256e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> >>> @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ int drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned i
> >>> {
> >>> struct drm_device *dev = client->dev;
> >>> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> >>> - int ret;
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>> * Rate-limit update frequency to vblank. If there's a DRM master
> >>> @@ -1326,15 +1326,24 @@ int drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned i
> >>> * Only wait for a vblank event if the CRTC is enabled, otherwise
> >>> * just don't do anything, not even report an error.
> >>> */
> >>> + if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev)) {
> >>> + if (!crtc->state || !crtc->state->active)
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + if (!crtc->enabled)
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >> This part is good.
> > Locking is missing.
>
> Ok
>
> >
> >>> ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
> >>> if (!ret) {
> >>> drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(crtc);
> >>> drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +out:
> >>> drm_master_internal_release(dev);
> >>>
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + return ret;
> >> But this isn't. There can be CRTCs without any vblank at all. We still
> >> want to fail silently for them. So we still have to return 0 here.
> >>
> >> Having set this, fixing this helper is only partially what you want.
> >> Since your device has vblanking, the emulation should check on the
> >> correct CRTC. IOW you need to pass the right CRTC index at
> >>
> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c#L237
> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c#L920
> >>
> >> I'm not quite sure how to support this. The CRTC is under
> >> fb_helper->client.modesets.crtc. You'd have to figure out which is the
> >> relevant one and use that. But that's also not so great, as fbdev ioctls
> >> only support CRTC 0. Doing internal re-mappings only complicates matters.
> >>
> >> But why does your HW use CRTC 1 in the first place.
> > Could be eg. the enabled outputs can't be driven with CRTC 0.
> >
> > I guess what you want to do is pick the first crtc from modesets[]
> > which is enabled. Or perhaps even "pick the Nth enabled crtc from
> > modesets[] based on the ioctl argument".
>
> The enable-status of each CRTC could change later on, which might lead
> to problems.
Sound like a locking issue if someone is changing the configuration
at the same time we're trying to do the vblank wait here.
> Picking the one CRTC/output with the lowest spec and
> mirroring it to the others might work. This CRTC would then be the one
> to wait for.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> >
>
> --
> --
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
> GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 9:24 [PATCH] drm/client: check whether CRTC is active before waiting for vblank Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-19 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-19 11:29 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-22 9:23 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-05-22 9:48 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-22 11:55 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 13:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-22 13:24 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 13:28 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-05-22 13:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 14:01 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-22 14:09 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 19:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahBZ8nIqR4qESLZg@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
--cc=zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox