From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47883232395 for ; Sat, 23 May 2026 16:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779555104; cv=none; b=SecAtwq80gUZnCvg184m4wJy4GmdXuhO71cRFoxVT3sT1Z4OKDGhCmY6HSZtsyQAGP4CdQFSp7qpLIuAF0omHJ9eicIj8rUbpTcBWwM0MmP7PqU91Uq3vDnoEtpqajKUhVqRQHsrHrR2DePLIrYzNbpRiIfY8+6j/KWpxpDI9uY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779555104; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iTidN3F81Jah3XVANBRxCoojAySuHYgdDF+zBpHSWnI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QfRdl5oHaIRDVK4PN7OW3KCHZna4a9pwbmARTkOp9HE3sBWstVDrGTnJUSQ/Ec8q95kRv+SPDvpFt/GPNmw9FnVPgxzqM4xU4A8QNNds6F22mIFGNl3A9N7OeHkksqPR7zPgZ2G4jsH+2NFePH4T7CAjFEwYjtWM6jkArPXL0Kc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=H/86Sq7/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="H/86Sq7/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A89021F000E9; Sat, 23 May 2026 16:51:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779555102; bh=joKLIL3ONfOSnnRBUuqZh/rkH2nj5hE3ZMRfcdtP0CY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=H/86Sq7/kriiYFYnT+p4onX5kQnH41zVQDHZB1riI4nXTD4LxXKk+RP8A3dY4J7pF mwTwN8QEUAdbRH+yhbwFdafmv8VWk93QjmgI6E87EeRKPKYvjgXuvxLK5EzPextXXd QyVH0jb3Gpe/bQ32DIrK98GGQ1Z9fRd3opHrD8ufxcEHsOCpIB1p+O11BoCIKwyD9D k2WtFzg4FSkGdl3maYF3CIXi9mHKb7OOdYgEv7PI9IViPRN2GvFG+713EP43gC8yNm 3n+nIbf+na7BzcR8vJRWIvW6YCo9L7Zq5V5gmf8vD6T6dGM5CVWqgIh3Ael076KUQH 4PudTPkmSwrFQ== Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 12:51:41 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: AlanCui4080 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch Subject: Re: Patch "nvme: add quirk NVME_QUIRK_IGNORE_DEV_SUBNQN for 144d:a808 (Samsung PM981/983/970 EVO Plus )" has been added to the 7.0-stable tree Message-ID: References: <20260523143029.590331-1-sashal@kernel.org> <9hBwPrIRQFOSOc3QwbVPmQ@alancui.cc> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <9hBwPrIRQFOSOc3QwbVPmQ@alancui.cc> On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 10:40:37PM +0800, AlanCui4080 wrote: >On Saturday, 23 May 2026 22:30，Sasha Levin wrote： >> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled >> >> nvme: add quirk NVME_QUIRK_IGNORE_DEV_SUBNQN for 144d:a808 (Samsung PM981/983/970 EVO Plus ) >> >> to the 7.0-stable tree which can be found at: >> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary >> >> The filename of the patch is: >> nvme-add-quirk-nvme_quirk_ignore_dev_subnqn-for-144d.patch >> and it can be found in the queue-7.0 subdirectory. >> >> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, >> please let know about it. >> >> >> >> commit e86bd12c5a99ae20455deaa902dc8ab755d9f1e7 >> Author: Alan Cui >> Date: Thu Apr 9 16:15:25 2026 +0800 >> >> nvme: add quirk NVME_QUIRK_IGNORE_DEV_SUBNQN for 144d:a808 (Samsung PM981/983/970 EVO Plus ) >> >> [ Upstream commit 7f991e3f9b8f044640bcb5fa8570350a68932843 ] >> >> The firmware for Samsung 970 Evo Plus / PM981 / PM983 does not support SUBNQN. >> Make quirks to suppress warnings. > >This commit is actually a mistake and is reverted in 7.1-rc4. > >https://lkml.org/lkml/2026/5/17/896 >AlanCui4080 (1): > Revert "nvme: add quirk NVME_QUIRK_IGNORE_DEV_SUBNQN for 144d:a808" > >Sorry I'm new to the kernel, and i don't know how "backport" works, but since >this commit is a mistake, so should it to be not merged into the stable? Now dropped, thanks. -- Thanks, Sasha