From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] l2tp: fix tunnel refcount leak on register failure
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 12:31:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahgZerhdz5KcVMNz@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528043418.1153320-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 04:34:18AM +0000, Wentao Liang wrote:
> pppol2tp_tunnel_get() creates a new tunnel via l2tp_tunnel_create()
> which initializes tunnel->ref_count to 1, then increments it to 2 via
> refcount_inc(). If l2tp_tunnel_register() subsequently fails, the
> error path calls kfree(tunnel) directly, bypassing the refcount
> mechanism entirely.
This is the expected behaviour. Since l2tp_tunnel_register() failed,
the tunnel hasn't been exposed to the rest of the system and we're
guaranteed that nothing depends on it.
> This leaves the tunnel's ref_count at 2 with no
> way to properly release it through l2tp_tunnel_put().
The tunnel is simply freed. The refcount doesn't matter here.
> Replace kfree(tunnel) with l2tp_tunnel_put(tunnel) to properly release
> the reference through the standard refcount cleanup path, which will
> call l2tp_tunnel_free() when the counter reaches zero.
This is buggy. At this point, the refcount is 2, and l2tp_tunnel_put()
will decrement it by only one. So this patch just leaks the the tunnel
forever.
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 6b9f34239b00 ("l2tp: fix races in tunnel creation")
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
> index 99d6582f41de..16672e9df748 100644
> --- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
> +++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
> @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ static struct l2tp_tunnel *pppol2tp_tunnel_get(struct net *net,
> refcount_inc(&tunnel->ref_count);
> error = l2tp_tunnel_register(tunnel, net, &tcfg);
> if (error < 0) {
> - kfree(tunnel);
> + l2tp_tunnel_put(tunnel);
> return ERR_PTR(error);
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 4:34 [PATCH] l2tp: fix tunnel refcount leak on register failure Wentao Liang
2026-05-28 10:31 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahgZerhdz5KcVMNz@debian \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox