Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arve@android.com, tkjos@android.com,
	 brauner@kernel.org, cmllamas@google.com, mo@sdhn.cc,
	wedsonaf@gmail.com,  Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust_binder: use a u64 stride when cleaning up the offsets array
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 07:46:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahlEZyeCOBtK3ydd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ahj88dV6McFC0oFu@v4bel>

On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 11:41:53AM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 10:19:27AM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> > Allocation's Drop walks the offsets array (binder_size_t = u64 entries),
> > cleaning up the objects, but it used usize instead of u64 for both the
> > stride and the per-entry read.
> > 
> > On 64-bit kernels (usize == u64) this is harmless, but on 32-bit kernels
> > it walks the 8-byte entries in 4-byte steps, iterating an N-entry array
> > 2N times, and reads the always-zero high word as offset 0, cleaning up
> > the object at offset 0 N extra times. As a result the referenced node or
> > handle ends up with a lower reference count than it actually has (a
> > refcount over-decrement), and binder's reference accounting is corrupted;
> > for example, the owner can be notified of a strong reference release
> > (BR_RELEASE) even though references still remain.
> > 
> > Change the stride to u64, and read each entry as a u64, narrowing it to
> > usize with try_into().
> > 
> > On 32-bit ARM, when this over-decrement would drive a count below zero,
> > the driver's existing refcount guard refuses it and fires:
> > 
> >   rust_binder: Failure: refcount underflow!
> > 
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: eafedbc7c050 ("rust_binder: add Rust Binder driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/android/binder/allocation.rs | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/android/binder/allocation.rs b/drivers/android/binder/allocation.rs
> > index 0cab959e4b7e..f4ffc57a8cb2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/android/binder/allocation.rs
> > +++ b/drivers/android/binder/allocation.rs
> > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ fn drop(&mut self) {
> >  
> >              if let Some(offsets) = info.offsets.clone() {
> >                  let view = AllocationView::new(self, offsets.start);
> > -                for i in offsets.step_by(size_of::<usize>()) {
> > +                for i in offsets.step_by(size_of::<u64>()) {
> >                      if view.cleanup_object(i).is_err() {
> >                          pr_warn!("Error cleaning up object at offset {}\n", i)
> >                      }
> > @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ pub(crate) fn transfer_binder_object(
> >      }
> >  
> >      fn cleanup_object(&self, index_offset: usize) -> Result {
> > -        let offset = self.alloc.read(index_offset)?;
> > +        let offset: usize = self.alloc.read::<u64>(index_offset)?.try_into().map_err(|_| EINVAL)?;
> >          let header = self.read::<BinderObjectHeader>(offset)?;
> >          match header.type_ {
> >              BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_BINDER | BINDER_TYPE_BINDER => {
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> > 
> 
> The BC_FREE_BUFFER handling in thread.rs's write() seems to have 
> a similar problem.
> 
> Sashiko's review:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/ahjpn-3WQTywTdyj@v4bel?part=1

Yeah I think there are a few instances of this. Would be nice to fix
them.

Alice

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-29  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-29  1:19 [PATCH] rust_binder: use a u64 stride when cleaning up the offsets array Hyunwoo Kim
2026-05-29  2:41 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-05-29  7:46   ` Alice Ryhl [this message]
2026-05-29  6:18 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ahlEZyeCOBtK3ydd@google.com \
    --to=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mo@sdhn.cc \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox