From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B1E402B8D for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781005180; cv=none; b=ssIMUK22qMThRl+GVnWyTv/b1DMpIJweM2kn9cVKVUt7Z1xd0c104pmJtN+D9ohbyfO0VqcgsZuP5mbq1G+2GyJOyzgkE+HiX76d1VCfBmTF6tTc9pFfBwEGIdf0rxCWqqX9iN39AGTpDBFy8aGOt/rDORgE/UEpTJSNMoGVdvk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781005180; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v0oNpovBDxYRdhN70lC1jLW3FFZoFv0QmeL6FwC8CHI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YIftYyW3DGzWGJDSc0Xz21+s0iDE53XlWLWvSbxzK9foWHSTUzPOP17hy+/KEXTMOJebDCmwWqmEoSTSkhzC+/vH7UW3x6iwxtPU8f8FbZtzfazsWDlmc8sS6W8BxwfxA2Ze0iDPLDxf+Tn9kb1zWuptDTOzD8ozvMohuuYxT/4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=XCEMkPMv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="XCEMkPMv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1781005176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qm+Sbk9IuXXgtzP+mHXUfGC0wxxue4TlT/GMvB7XuWg=; b=XCEMkPMvBU5XDjajsabNSt7N1PNrjIFAs12K1vuUlmU4hTUXDzxE5us5MRA3baLxtIX+RI LeWid/uhkd+U7nTgEIFXbSTYvjbYdUPrvkcyv/043JDN27Ww3tVrAVDPjHJzBOnuanqJe7 lPk8ymZr1wqOo0bDCWKc0bbby5I5o3U= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-264-48CTobu6OxeHHoJTXJMuVg-1; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:39:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 48CTobu6OxeHHoJTXJMuVg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 48CTobu6OxeHHoJTXJMuVg_1781005172 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E435F1944AA6; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thinkpad (headnet01.pony-001.prod.rdu2.dc.redhat.com [10.11.142.86]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81FDC3008B37; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 13:39:27 +0200 From: Felix Maurer To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, Steffen Lindner , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18.y 1/2] hsr: Implement more robust duplicate discard for PRP Message-ID: References: <2026052838-cleat-rewrite-24c4@gregkh> <20260529232406.1883397-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20260601075222.hFB8WzTJ@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Felix Maurer wrote: > I don't really know the guidelines around the stable trees. Do we want > such (heavily modfied) patches so that others can be applied? I only now saw the patches Sasha posted for the older stable trees (like [1] for 6.12.y). I think we should do the same thing for 6.18.y as well and not backport the rather big 415e6367512b ("hsr: Implement more robust duplicate discard for PRP"). Thanks, Felix [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20260529233922.1913663-1-sashal@kernel.org/