From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:19:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Tejun Heo cc: LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andreas Herrmann , stable@vger.kernel.org, Carsten Emde Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Remove bogus smp_processor_id() usage In-Reply-To: <20121027191051.GA2693@htj.dyndns.org> Message-ID: References: <20121027191051.GA2693@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Thomas. > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 07:29:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > This is fully preemptible non cpu bound context though the comment in the > > code says: > > > > * Must run on @pol->cpu. cpufreq core is responsible for ensuring > > * that we're bound to the current CPU and pol->cpu stays online. > > > > The core only guarantees that pol->cpu stays online, but it has no way > > to bind the thread and this needs to be fully preemptible context as > > powernowk8_target_fn() calls functions which might sleep. > > > > So the correct solution is to always go through work_on_cpu(). > > Yeah, that was stupid. Rafael already has a patch queued. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git;a=commit;h=e4df1cbcc1f329e53a1fff7450b2229e0addff20 > Good. So more people noticed :) tglx