Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.2.y 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 10:41:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asS0UA_V0tHFPFrQ@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005225325.3487067-1-sashal@kernel.org>

Hi Sasha,

Was just about to deal with the backports.
All looks good.

Thank you for that!

---
BR
Beata
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 06:53:33PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 573371caf7aea8582212da81dcead2c3f48fac4b ]
> 
> Move the workaround from the erratum 2457168-specific cpucap to a generic
> broken AMU constant-counter one. This keeps the existing Cortex-A510
> handling unchanged while allowing other errata with similar AMU constant
> counter issue to share the capability bit and call sites.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> 
> Omit the comment update in amu_read_core_const_ctrs(), since paired
> CPPC FFH counter reads are not implemented here. Keep the capability
> rename in the existing counter-read and initialization paths, together
> with the shared MIDR range list needed by the additional erratum.
> 
> Stable-dep-of: 45f730467987 ("arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround")
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig             |  8 ++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c   |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps       |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index fc57d90d92c1d..a38a3940cf208 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1017,9 +1017,17 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_1902691
>  
>  	  If unsure, say Y.
>  
> +config ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> +	bool
> +	# Targeting errata affecting AMEVCNTR01, the AMU constant counter.
> +	# On affected CPUs the counter may not increment at the expected rate,
> +	# making it unreliable. As a result, AMU users should treat it as
> +	# unavailable rather than relying on misleading counter values.
> +
>  config ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
>  	bool "Cortex-A510: 2457168: workaround for AMEVCNTR01 incrementing incorrectly"
>  	depends on ARM64_AMU_EXTN
> +	select ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	  This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index be47908bb9d22..a6dc9f20373e5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -377,6 +377,16 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_repeat_tlbi_list[] = {
>  };
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> +static const struct midr_range workaround_amu_constcnt_list[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
> +	/* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
> +	MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1),
> +#endif
> +	{}
> +};
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT */
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_23154
>  static const struct midr_range cavium_erratum_23154_cpus[] = {
>  	MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_THUNDERX),
> @@ -904,14 +914,12 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
>  		ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
>  	},
>  #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
>  	{
> -		.desc = "ARM erratum 2457168",
> -		.capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168,
> +		.desc = "Broken AMU AMEVCNTR01 (const counter)",
> +		.capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT,
>  		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE,
> -
> -		/* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
> -		CAP_MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1)
> +		CAP_MIDR_RANGE_LIST(workaround_amu_constcnt_list)
>  	},
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 103e70d683ca2..5dbc20d6d9694 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@ static void cpu_amu_enable(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
>  		cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &amu_cpus);
>  
>  		/* 0 reference values signal broken/disabled counters */
> -		if (!this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168))
> +		if (!this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT))
>  			update_freq_counters_refs();
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index a0d5870bcb657..15035f051c25b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
>  	 * the counter is disabled. A return value of 0 at counter read is
>  	 * properly handled as an error case by the users of the counter.
>  	 */
> -	*(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168) ?
> +	*(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT) ?
>  		      0UL : read_constcnt();
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> index 9b85a84f6fd49..050175dfa3240 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ WORKAROUND_1902691
>  WORKAROUND_2038923
>  WORKAROUND_2064142
>  WORKAROUND_2077057
> -WORKAROUND_2457168
>  WORKAROUND_2645198
>  WORKAROUND_2658417
>  WORKAROUND_4193714
> @@ -128,3 +127,4 @@ WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI
>  WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT
>  WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_SSBS
>  WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
> +WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-05 10:24 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree gregkh
2026-10-05 22:53 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap Sasha Levin
2026-10-05 22:53   ` [PATCH 7.2.y 2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround Sasha Levin
2026-10-06  8:44     ` Beata Michalska
2026-10-06  8:41   ` Beata Michalska [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asS0UA_V0tHFPFrQ@arm.com \
    --to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox