From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8709749A3AD for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792399830; cv=none; b=WXwKm3G9ng4pL9cjHMqaTMta8zBL9kgQG9o81/x/7q7jWjvRgn2oLnHQaKKSYA+j5y7CB1Cs863RmKB40MNEz5l5sOhJpODijg2R6MfZB4Lo+KxfwfN3eKOfdI8a+3KPMMxoBm6l9jSKoxFsLY9j3RNd2B9Jn9hNtIX6y/VopQQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792399830; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AoJUXfQlpBx9YGpGsuGpag/ce0ATIGMtiM/s3pVkdnQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Akc9QBHyvcjBlc0EzC8R+e6T7rzxKRbnoDx3oQRIrZDgEFnJMu/yrUtuK2iG5GHHx8lqk28+q9squYQWxik/0+PBsKPTpPuO3K68XoflL6mOY2emal7Yu987PcAOgW2zE2qABIUbxyCPnJRXigmplL+CuxWHVeBU1MzmxRqD+5c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=U9S3MVt4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="U9S3MVt4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1792399818; bh=dBoNG0JGnMePtauERpAtLY+t3Q4G4cAZenW9FRJQf5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=U9S3MVt45f96mA7NfcMSo0Rdojd2gj6gDqzrS5YBCHEv52sDx1TY4y6CK6n0OYdBC AmzzcOxAQk3GMzzC7vS4wLw/5EyHfdeRNoRTnR2TwKwXeEX0NhNWq0U/6A58wPIREP aL4kyG6oyZ48rqBwPTtYjOFnNR6+ncgo+wnw+CcxZc0jLuklMVmh0FKL6sadO1TYWg OjldqlyGz3lCpQGvgJnpvcztdpAf99GRsNV9hCwT7fZSZP46p9wZrHSRlwZFOy2fHv +VA5bWZt3gWSrme7DYe4OQBGkGlfzek0Qdw0my1VRw8SdczFFutU36ifcFlXHo0G50 P+qf1THejnxTg== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 5298660057; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:50:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:50:14 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Abdifatah Suruur Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal , security@kernel.org, Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [SECURITY] netfilter: nft_byteorder leaks uninitialised kernel stack on 6.12.y with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE (CWE-457) Message-ID: References: <179235055956.10524.6485282696272965887@gmail.com> <179236182769.4914.3317139682579833845@gmail.com> <179239012164.14465.16534329674629579851@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179239012164.14465.16534329674629579851@gmail.com> On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 09:08:41AM +0300, Abdifatah Suruur wrote: > Hi Florian, stable, > > Thanks for the explanation and the Ack. The explicit memset patch is > attached with your Acked-by; it applies cleanly to 6.12.113. > > Stable maintainers: would you prefer this minimal init patch or a backport > of bb061d3de4170741? Either works from my side. The memset preserves the > existing multi-register ABI and is the smaller change; Florian is fine with > either. > > I will request a CVE via cve@kernel.org once this is queued, per the > documented process. Are you requesting a CVE for something that is fixed upstream?