From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794227723; b=fzxkdAbooPKxrmGILJYmT6Xh0ESfD3jVVnOPag58UXBMM0J/UpNAJWKJ2hhqV6ktlStC c8CcKETRP3yseDnC56hsHX5kq+SrdI28wg3MJUTo2qo+8lPbdzcg3CvnRAA1X9uCTbYSE CC94Bs6q5LJpAawfEehyKGaMbSScC5rS9Pa+/I0oeS8GxjLLz3HPfZpNReH7v54IJc/59 PidWLhQ4QLPWQXxiRXOZPGgAnZL82SNgi0TOlYmnIUdP+9wstBymIr4bb7yfbzu5SkmqC 3N/BKrxoIeVBcrvPLtn38HVYBs+PlGyKOQlLC6Cj/6hFt0YB2Cf5LWsVQk9NgnGjL/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794227723; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:X-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Checker-Version; bh=oxHdGlhi4cZ/jhlBUDoZrZFRSMU9x1K2uotAGDmaO5c=; b=eopmXTpofGSrZmHo7eeExjdce5eiWheMp5VZIcmhoYeblutgjxLbwo2wURJ+19j33u0l BzAQbG1payXn1BgyzmaejT/VArQ9kN/gdF4oJT7eijn+P7EGq+NpHuh909Pfg3Q9KhGA9 MwfADYFaGZBSdZVGqOqLjma7LnZsx9JT7OMzKSALnjiOYFxOzbR01BhUszYDjBzIE3YyQ EVjQ4jr6oRTF7GkYHzN18fmDBr9yjH/c/YkB61tQ72amqQ0HWK6eNIuCNn3wxNz9ZPwlV 1BBeKWm8TuDQ7ajZdEaoi76yGhutQia8jnTFJg3QV+guSWInBKbkNKH4pquxC0oS5bQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=eROZzNMA; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 59E75606A322 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 12:35:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 59E75606A322 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=eROZzNMA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1794227720; bh=oxHdGlhi4cZ/jhlBUDoZrZFRSMU9x1K2uotAGDmaO5c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eROZzNMAly+9Uq3U7zSS6oaIQXNOSLfvd50OshK+DNA5z3tTPNejgt5XNzODXW3pd CherxxeTaASHt5ojxfrhfC8KPaSuEO+td5MUV7Zhdh7lszvSoap1zjedsd7m1Z+Lgo zxx41Qt59zMZFGsH8qfar+fDV9Xz5otwiqVeN30zAjWuSb2XdFMWVwmN/6mx6rpy7j LomOWrE9cW2RrhvbkZxuDA9jHKd+EQaVBqSUiCNVORN+IAYPAWeY09E2Qvy717P88g FSBToUMM9uDXBpfH33cSK6HHkx8v150kjSDe6rFJjTVLVylYw6oSYVl4kCxQ8l0CxQ M8agnCQvMIzzw== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id A697560058; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 13:35:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 13:35:17 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Abdifatah Suruur Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal , Greg KH , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18.y 1/2] Revert "netfilter: nft_byteorder: remove multi-register support" Message-ID: References: <179422702104.5131.8115555421206983838@gmail.com> <179422702651.5131.4174988605567778384@gmail.com> X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 01:26:02PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 03:23:46PM +0300, Abdifatah Suruur wrote: > > This reverts commit dc29c0478b8564feb9371e715b5a0016eb8903fd. > > > > The upstream change removes multi-register byteorder support and is > > tagged stable+noautosel because nftables versions before 1.1.0 can > > generate length/size combinations that the removal rejects. Backporting > > it to stable can make existing rulesets fail to load. > > Same thing here, if this can break stuff, this cannot be taken as is. Apologies, please, withdraw this comment I made.