From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794227111; b=BY+o1lG5a0gZngJkKlXr1pGVQGWp7Rv06fkwCRaVDXb3NBBUXhGtZW92P7FREAtaQjRH 03Fn1htusQDpsXkszR+uCTcgrDPJjvtQnA1P03j7lzSNsGB1jaXp4NA/lSMtfUunwh38H wQd7l6ChNg+3nG5JTf5jvIhAk3OpGZC3182ODgVce83g/Fr8s6ACM9ZHqjOsU0zH++/Af xZBxFQ2JG9NRgJTAcOu4+rxPLEd5centm2H+u/pUswa6kT07YZsJeaFpqQXvnF7Pmd8Eo SLMDG3MoN75vk9jlTEv1/L2gcTYxmYo9D1O78yMWcoonxuTSvdORnSVOuX7bCk4mVfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794227111; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:X-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Checker-Version; bh=krPYFvRCn7MZV7TmlVOcRGVHAdfTM4LBJcOvPC3fy5A=; b=iVrH7o/yd91GJrZge+iRwQ9oyn+sfPZ4UFM6QdLDPfZCaT+TuLaUx87PdhES6tGmovBN 2KR8eV/c4aejvpXv0qZTkw3rrgnn/0GQi8ThSO3GYjb7HDrk7gjn1wotoArGCT2Cf+lLb Sugxpq75Idjq9DAJ12m9w7+55+WA/CLYRnUWugebnjdfeaOzv4Yq3z3Z4JRRMhrFfAmbZ FvGnPiLjOk/EGrZtsutqvZOz9FTzDn24adlVxCnWl9rBQzzRq2T1PyYUe6eQ78EkTW6hL hRIOt5w+o+PjZGcngOpkFHOPxWsAdJvUdu0DR6f1hzXJBq1o2t0DoFfYGd0Rw/46Lew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b="DHuOvQs/"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 8E553606A31C for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 12:25:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 8E553606A31C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=DHuOvQs/ DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1794227107; bh=krPYFvRCn7MZV7TmlVOcRGVHAdfTM4LBJcOvPC3fy5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DHuOvQs/Uf92vxWrkkVAO5aOiAPrUxxlS98XJQMV4aFeQpH08QjFfJ7miUAaMU7Qo fwMSEANo/zVXj4Z7UqXUBHL1lchV2WyWlg/LnB9o9tJ+fv2vTK8saCoPivfWxqFIqc mXkoxbhZSlJDECGuHeM6sp6usSEqFi93XhJeGC0yds6hd+sj6M/+KqTpIgS68wlkdf mtYYJieZgRnNdmM1eoO84DrLoFT18KWN94k/slgry8zr9Fbj4P/WBbRAx7Tjz8t+7t ioUPpqfhd+udP2hL8gtLnAhstrUb75PNFBkm5/IV/VGGDr9/kNXBdlIzOVqWpwjRkM UzamUqee7dUtw== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 9A96860058; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 13:25:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 13:25:04 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Abdifatah Suruur Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal , Greg KH , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] Revert "netfilter: nft_byteorder: remove multi-register support" Message-ID: References: <179422696909.5131.4005481731765358036@gmail.com> <179422697447.5131.3947908931395034167@gmail.com> X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179422697447.5131.3947908931395034167@gmail.com> Hi, On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 03:22:54PM +0300, Abdifatah Suruur wrote: > This reverts commit 3c5fb3a6c8118d15e60295e76fb5b879021eef43. > > The upstream change removes multi-register byteorder support and is > tagged stable+noautosel because nftables versions before 1.1.0 can > generate length/size combinations that the removal rejects. Backporting > it to stable can make existing rulesets fail to load. Yes, so why are you posting this as is?