From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794227689; b=gnA/JVM59hh55IwmTFQ483rPBmtACZ4TLMaPX3lwYVSB9vAk2kQ6y9kIdCzWAZjEeuRe ZmIL+FLPJkzEcSrtQkP5k7n5Q7NPvwRLDNZzjmFd4ChYRH6ZLDIcBx9bsL97WOJlP/DhY MfKF4NXo6j/J46O6KSOwxWSsvFWq0TLdoSv5qgr7C29pw62O0hDAoxFxsasMG00jZM5jB SJylJFG+Pp5d2JC0sDjtp2O06AbBstV7KsyjaflcttgFDE2v/93zN+FQ4i15rexY2x8iU OekT59VoaI/Zd9ttf1FIUzU8KwCiYYv8sjcRb38TEUG0V/6bVI0FyQCdyPS751LwR0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794227689; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:X-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Checker-Version; bh=td1e4a4NYRjzlcoXNHPRcB5+Pke2f+Tg9BtofB06drE=; b=x3UeEGm7pU8E7K4muqgumqJEy3KeMaSrycIDIRRoZMM3dOH0TNdDPoMVCwKZEoIesQ9d C1vV3NWr4OVn/7RuKKO6UEXvpi/CA8kERXoMVTHajm/VgeWoFcYRSunwxEGORsyUx0vWi kjPeyltLMK/cFF/WKaoAJQJz+mOnqYdhsQglav1sPatBb8zC9Pm6BpWPGG+hpVAmLJYI4 cDZuXVwDd/XHzJwwCo0jE/019MvZPIXCMNbwozW3/rpD2sG/Vx2kGU6O+/+F11Py1VFRv HX9nMEIHzLDgFLPmtlr+Khl7Gk4MNLsf4RcZ6Tv7yqeqHOSy/j2HIXYrwwhxTjnSPMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=Q1NHFNC2; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 316E1606A334 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 12:34:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 316E1606A334 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=Q1NHFNC2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1794227687; bh=td1e4a4NYRjzlcoXNHPRcB5+Pke2f+Tg9BtofB06drE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q1NHFNC20PK8M766Z/MQXVcGVcSQAFLYhOH7jFk0ocDpi3XEQlF9sMZYuyNsURPyl Ol06bgWzzJ+5hzjjIL46SjYmObZHTcwPlYc+BdaF0HBFmSeLcqaMiTpsD34IS8MDlc zo8b/W0j/EhzQaJWD6+IFrKpZNtdsJMciqfi07ckNmy19CViItPpwI+Pdu1fvUiaW4 XTIb9adygY9bjdxj4Ga+/E8PAK69lZ0jYadUNd3OVlyUcvbj5Zpwtv9vZpXc1Lg2o9 gl+Fgii1L/BaCpHOCSngXUnQ86Xokfmxe8JmBVIyc2vXMMeVYmgHgCx5+nWvGdneQH i4PqkZ3YXQYxQ== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 0A53560058; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 13:34:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 13:34:44 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Abdifatah Suruur Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal , Greg KH , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] Revert "netfilter: nft_byteorder: remove multi-register support" Message-ID: References: <179422696909.5131.4005481731765358036@gmail.com> <179422697447.5131.3947908931395034167@gmail.com> X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 01:25:08PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 03:22:54PM +0300, Abdifatah Suruur wrote: > > This reverts commit 3c5fb3a6c8118d15e60295e76fb5b879021eef43. > > > > The upstream change removes multi-register byteorder support and is > > tagged stable+noautosel because nftables versions before 1.1.0 can > > generate length/size combinations that the removal rejects. Backporting > > it to stable can make existing rulesets fail to load. > > Yes, so why are you posting this as is? Apologies, I got this all wrong. I thought you wanted to pull in "netfilter: nft_byteorder: remove multi-register support" but this already slipped through -stable? So your series look correct. Sorry for the fuzz.