public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/21] drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:50:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b244f88e85a44485be9038c622fa13b1@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220718165341.30ee6e31@maurocar-mobl2>

From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> Sent: 18 July 2022 15:54
> 
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:16:10 +0100
> Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 14/07/2022 13:06, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > From: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Check if the device is powered down prior to any engine activity,
> > > as, on such cases, all the TLBs were already invalidated, so an
> > > explicit TLB invalidation is not needed, thus reducing the
> > > performance regression impact due to it.
> > >
> > > This becomes more significant with GuC, as it can only do so when
> > > the connection to the GuC is awake.
> > >
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Fixes: 7938d61591d3 ("drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store")
> >
> > Patch itself looks fine but I don't think we closed on the issue of
> > stable/fixes on this patch?
> 
> No, because TLB cache invalidation takes time and causes time outs, which
> in turn affects applications and produce Kernel warnings.

It's not only the TLB flushes that cause grief.

There is a loop that forces a write-back of all the frame buffer pages.
With a large display and some cpu (like my Ivy bridge one) that
takes long enough with pre-emption disabled that wakeup of RT processes
(and any pinned to the cpu) takes far longer than one might have
wished for.

Since some X servers request a flush every few seconds this makes
the system unusable for some workloads.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1657800199.git.mchehab@kernel.org>
2022-07-14 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-18 13:16   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-18 14:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-18 15:01       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-18 15:50       ` David Laight [this message]
2022-07-19  7:24         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-19  7:45           ` David Laight
2022-07-22 11:56   ` Andi Shyti
2022-07-14 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-18 13:24   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-22 11:57   ` Andi Shyti
2022-07-14 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] drm/i915/gt: Only invalidate TLBs exposed to user manipulation Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-18 13:39   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-18 16:00     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-22 11:58   ` Andi Shyti
2022-07-14 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-18 13:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-18 16:06     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-19  7:19       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-22 12:00   ` Andi Shyti
2022-07-14 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-18 13:52   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-20  7:13     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-20 10:49       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-20 10:54   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-27 11:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 12:56       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-28  6:32         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-28  7:26           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-28 10:11           ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b244f88e85a44485be9038c622fa13b1@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox