From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91EB256C90; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744277318; cv=none; b=p1nfwjvi/FheLGrGB4e1PHZv5CXFUZp60iO+tHdqascNkBVWV03nCt+eRwGQJrBvXeb+zRdIhlidtEZ9wf26/qos997NW6sWYQ6YRuEmHxUOh4wBT64ABa0auBqGjY8AzIY1+YKvhGwdB4sQCWc/qLg1pFyg3xVosvIa4cEM7Pg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744277318; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SPlSdN2gYFFkaeYx3wI2cVeA5iCWnjK1bIIn+mR/MWs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fq6BF2XjqPaDFnEMFlqR1gFVEJt24QD4JjQI2jNked5LAtSJ8msK48OnGLb31b3Dhk9KyTa27yB1Qi8fHFRkXfmRGcmGiMhi1UfZGOAXXj0FJGjf8cnTb0+xEcr20GgOtEYfu4bcJ7b2G+v+0w2rm4WqMXEw/mwSHeSMw3W10os= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DH9bbBxr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DH9bbBxr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1744277316; x=1775813316; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SPlSdN2gYFFkaeYx3wI2cVeA5iCWnjK1bIIn+mR/MWs=; b=DH9bbBxrhu4YfD9QXnB16xVae48SaTOCueuULcedC1BYHCYwEAak+JWh Hu4DcZBzq7FI8jW/iIAInYP3kLZ5k+s0W1P4cjwVNEgKsovsfXBYPzjwW jJ64KyBhChZEebSWknQ8AktAtPKLtzC+WflF5f24te9ZEHevZ79Mmn8j2 TWg9P4w+94GQ+Z7Ztpx0oTAmYHCQZAVrunG/bEIjEUhWZu0ukM3bM/sh0 I5LjZQbXCLTJGkNFov8Ozd1mca0elUrZxldaiqMHp8AjN2WZgox3cp95k p0iXLc6NDHqiiazRd+Uli8hyu9JkQSf8TyqgcGtNhcSbKK2H7xJJROvDG Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jli9ZyHaQN607HngNpFeiQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lZ8NmSLiQNWQdE8CKy1PYw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11399"; a="57168207" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,202,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="57168207" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2025 02:27:37 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: abz7UXdRS6W2DsU4AlI4/A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6CE/erL6SNGiu35pCr4KCg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,202,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="152025459" Received: from kwywiol-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.245.83.152]) ([10.245.83.152]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2025 02:27:36 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:27:34 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/ivpu: Add handling of VPU_JSM_STATUS_MVNCI_CONTEXT_VIOLATION_HW To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Karol Wachowski References: <20250408095711.635185-1-jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> <8d96c75d-e8fb-446b-a85c-803a2b5212ed@linux.intel.com> <2025041011-borrowing-shrug-781e@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Jacek Lawrynowicz Organization: Intel Technology Poland sp. z o.o. - ul. Slowackiego 173, 80-298 Gdansk - KRS 101882 - NIP 957-07-52-316 In-Reply-To: <2025041011-borrowing-shrug-781e@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 4/10/2025 10:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:49:37AM +0200, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is an important patch for the Intel NPU. >> Is there anything it is missing to be included in stable? > > Patience, you only sent this: > >> On 4/8/2025 11:57 AM, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote: > > 2 days ago, AFTER the latest of -rc releases was sent out for review, > and those kernels have NOT even been released yet! > > [rant about how you all know this process works deleted as it was > just snarky on my side, although quite cathartic, thanks for letting me > vent...] > > Relax, it will get handled when we can get to it. To help out, please > take the time to review pending stable backported patches that have been > submitted to the mailing list ahead of yours. Yeah, sorry about that. It seems I'm still learning the art of patience in the kernel processes. I didn't mean to rush anything. I was just worried my patch might have been overlooked due to a typo or a wrong commit message tag. I'll make sure to review the backported patches in the meantime. And thanks for holding back on the rant. I really think that the standard set by Linus is not healthy. Regards, Jacek