From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745841C8FBE; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725617427; cv=none; b=Fpbc/BoafYp4eU5TAmBnUK47lv/Zk6Uu/8DXNVOUVZsNCH0/zBf42LEckTCwoKjDhXDX+fS07T3mDIY3wTZ2mRNAV5o8hP8/L8bbOsDCMRXsa86cp2ZAjh3EwgPIIYxZpnzNTZdle7vVNCHkGjmHgu+KakbhbpCXZAZC2T5fTaU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725617427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aHlWIs2y7UxXRyPHG97BeELexgtOF0bS+sKBfH9ulbk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=g2hDK40N6/VCc5ZGJLWgy3MEU571LUbaI2h6n2ReutkbMRcBvYpbvQizqwG8XXcJOitFM9Yp9YU8jN+15yZe7qPLVy+OPJyu2+jN/Ac6aWHIo4nV2ABx0CdRnFtfNr4x7rfo6fpM1oYNcx70i0mFkLGpHoh3sYKj8Mui/VLo4W8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gr3fMeFJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gr3fMeFJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05A9FC4CEC4; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:10:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725617426; bh=aHlWIs2y7UxXRyPHG97BeELexgtOF0bS+sKBfH9ulbk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=gr3fMeFJxfyVvL3v3Hjr5XjzIOXzdQRVM7Kj8VR9xTI0eFEmncMpux6Z4GU7BCJU/ 4srO1HTXsZTOWD8ZnbUKNOl/IaZdz6jShQ2tju8mG7xWlhAvPAUL1alMpXFWxYotUN HjlG9TzIaEV9W857GMOjZbUqr8Pd23VRVq1FYFyb54iEkQ0HwUcb4h/bqnoXYJRVv+ jQK6WWwcESv+4GhOC7yCoGtu1am5FExnnPvXZmd3WxDdYaeMNn0ErDnk1U9BsMUTWx /d5KKbk1fPCjbvAjnfa+Ak/j0Qp19Ps3NyAxmGWe7Da0EEc7gaMtREDu8ROpFjzrAm NlFFHrkc67BJQ== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:10:22 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: MPTCP stable backports: is the workflow OK? Content-Language: en-GB To: Greg KH , Sasha Levin Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, MPTCP Linux References: <32148274-08bb-4031-a55b-6b16b48a5497@kernel.org> <2024090642-viewing-happier-23b8@gregkh> From: Matthieu Baerts Autocrypt: addr=matttbe@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFXj+ekBEADxVr99p2guPcqHFeI/JcFxls6KibzyZD5TQTyfuYlzEp7C7A9swoK5iCvf YBNdx5Xl74NLSgx6y/1NiMQGuKeu+2BmtnkiGxBNanfXcnl4L4Lzz+iXBvvbtCbynnnqDDqU c7SPFMpMesgpcu1xFt0F6bcxE+0ojRtSCZ5HDElKlHJNYtD1uwY4UYVGWUGCF/+cY1YLmtfb WdNb/SFo+Mp0HItfBC12qtDIXYvbfNUGVnA5jXeWMEyYhSNktLnpDL2gBUCsdbkov5VjiOX7 CRTkX0UgNWRjyFZwThaZADEvAOo12M5uSBk7h07yJ97gqvBtcx45IsJwfUJE4hy8qZqsA62A nTRflBvp647IXAiCcwWsEgE5AXKwA3aL6dcpVR17JXJ6nwHHnslVi8WesiqzUI9sbO/hXeXw TDSB+YhErbNOxvHqCzZEnGAAFf6ges26fRVyuU119AzO40sjdLV0l6LE7GshddyazWZf0iac nEhX9NKxGnuhMu5SXmo2poIQttJuYAvTVUNwQVEx/0yY5xmiuyqvXa+XT7NKJkOZSiAPlNt6 VffjgOP62S7M9wDShUghN3F7CPOrrRsOHWO/l6I/qJdUMW+MHSFYPfYiFXoLUZyPvNVCYSgs 3oQaFhHapq1f345XBtfG3fOYp1K2wTXd4ThFraTLl8PHxCn4ywARAQABzSRNYXR0aGlldSBC YWVydHMgPG1hdHR0YmVAa2VybmVsLm9yZz7CwZEEEwEIADsCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYC AwECHgECF4AWIQToy4X3aHcFem4n93r2t4JPQmmgcwUCZUDpDAIZAQAKCRD2t4JPQmmgcz33 EACjROM3nj9FGclR5AlyPUbAq/txEX7E0EFQCDtdLPrjBcLAoaYJIQUV8IDCcPjZMJy2ADp7 /zSwYba2rE2C9vRgjXZJNt21mySvKnnkPbNQGkNRl3TZAinO1Ddq3fp2c/GmYaW1NWFSfOmw MvB5CJaN0UK5l0/drnaA6Hxsu62V5UnpvxWgexqDuo0wfpEeP1PEqMNzyiVPvJ8bJxgM8qoC cpXLp1Rq/jq7pbUycY8GeYw2j+FVZJHlhL0w0Zm9CFHThHxRAm1tsIPc+oTorx7haXP+nN0J iqBXVAxLK2KxrHtMygim50xk2QpUotWYfZpRRv8dMygEPIB3f1Vi5JMwP4M47NZNdpqVkHrm jvcNuLfDgf/vqUvuXs2eA2/BkIHcOuAAbsvreX1WX1rTHmx5ud3OhsWQQRVL2rt+0p1DpROI 3Ob8F78W5rKr4HYvjX2Inpy3WahAm7FzUY184OyfPO/2zadKCqg8n01mWA9PXxs84bFEV2mP VzC5j6K8U3RNA6cb9bpE5bzXut6T2gxj6j+7TsgMQFhbyH/tZgpDjWvAiPZHb3sV29t8XaOF BwzqiI2AEkiWMySiHwCCMsIH9WUH7r7vpwROko89Tk+InpEbiphPjd7qAkyJ+tNIEWd1+MlX ZPtOaFLVHhLQ3PLFLkrU3+Yi3tXqpvLE3gO3LM7BTQRV4/npARAA5+u/Sx1n9anIqcgHpA7l 5SUCP1e/qF7n5DK8LiM10gYglgY0XHOBi0S7vHppH8hrtpizx+7t5DBdPJgVtR6SilyK0/mp 9nWHDhc9rwU3KmHYgFFsnX58eEmZxz2qsIY8juFor5r7kpcM5dRR9aB+HjlOOJJgyDxcJTwM 1ey4L/79P72wuXRhMibN14SX6TZzf+/XIOrM6TsULVJEIv1+NdczQbs6pBTpEK/G2apME7vf mjTsZU26Ezn+LDMX16lHTmIJi7Hlh7eifCGGM+g/AlDV6aWKFS+sBbwy+YoS0Zc3Yz8zrdbi Kzn3kbKd+99//mysSVsHaekQYyVvO0KD2KPKBs1S/ImrBb6XecqxGy/y/3HWHdngGEY2v2IP Qox7mAPznyKyXEfG+0rrVseZSEssKmY01IsgwwbmN9ZcqUKYNhjv67WMX7tNwiVbSrGLZoqf Xlgw4aAdnIMQyTW8nE6hH/Iwqay4S2str4HZtWwyWLitk7N+e+vxuK5qto4AxtB7VdimvKUs x6kQO5F3YWcC3vCXCgPwyV8133+fIR2L81R1L1q3swaEuh95vWj6iskxeNWSTyFAVKYYVskG V+OTtB71P1XCnb6AJCW9cKpC25+zxQqD2Zy0dK3u2RuKErajKBa/YWzuSaKAOkneFxG3LJIv Hl7iqPF+JDCjB5sAEQEAAcLBXwQYAQIACQUCVeP56QIbDAAKCRD2t4JPQmmgc5VnD/9YgbCr HR1FbMbm7td54UrYvZV/i7m3dIQNXK2e+Cbv5PXf19ce3XluaE+wA8D+vnIW5mbAAiojt3Mb 6p0WJS3QzbObzHNgAp3zy/L4lXwc6WW5vnpWAzqXFHP8D9PTpqvBALbXqL06smP47JqbyQxj Xf7D2rrPeIqbYmVY9da1KzMOVf3gReazYa89zZSdVkMojfWsbq05zwYU+SCWS3NiyF6QghbW voxbFwX1i/0xRwJiX9NNbRj1huVKQuS4W7rbWA87TrVQPXUAdkyd7FRYICNW+0gddysIwPoa KrLfx3Ba6Rpx0JznbrVOtXlihjl4KV8mtOPjYDY9u+8x412xXnlGl6AC4HLu2F3ECkamY4G6 UxejX+E6vW6Xe4n7H+rEX5UFgPRdYkS1TA/X3nMen9bouxNsvIJv7C6adZmMHqu/2azX7S7I vrxxySzOw9GxjoVTuzWMKWpDGP8n71IFeOot8JuPZtJ8omz+DZel+WCNZMVdVNLPOd5frqOv mpz0VhFAlNTjU1Vy0CnuxX3AM51J8dpdNyG0S8rADh6C8AKCDOfUstpq28/6oTaQv7QZdge0 JY6dglzGKnCi/zsmp2+1w559frz4+IC7j/igvJGX4KDDKUs0mlld8J2u2sBXv7CGxdzQoHaz lzVbFe7fduHbABmYz9cefQpO7wDE/Q== Organization: NGI0 Core In-Reply-To: <2024090642-viewing-happier-23b8@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Greg, Sasha, Thank you for your reply! On 06/09/2024 11:56, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:36:25AM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> Thank you again for your support when we send patches for stable >> versions for MPTCP! >> >> Recently, I sent many patches for the stable versions, and I just wanted >> to check if what I did was OK for you? >> >> I tried to reply to all the 'FAILED: patch' emails you sent, either with >> patches, or with reasons explaining why it is fine not to backport them. >> Are you OK with that? >> >> Or do you prefer only receiving the patches, and not the emails with the >> reasons not to backport some of them? >> >> About the patches, do you prefer to receive one big series per version >> or individual patches sent in reply to the different 'FAILED: patch' >> emails like I did? > > One big series, per kernel tree, would be ideal as that way I don't have > to pick them out and guess as to the order. Sure, I will do that next time, it is even easier for me. I sent the patches in the same order as they are in my working branch, but I understand they could be received in a different order. > Also, if you don't respond to the FAILED emails, that's fine with me, I > don't keep track, but maybe Sasha does as I know he does backports based > on them at times. So I'll let him answer that. Thanks! I will wait for Sasha's reply. > But in the end, whatever is easier for you is good for us, thanks! Thanks! Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.