From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-hotfixes v2 0/2] mm/page_alloc,slab: return NULL early from *_nolock() memory allocation APIs in NMI on UP
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:00:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3f7b8e4-85ae-4e80-bb02-a7b205cec88e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427-nolock-api-fix-v2-0-a6b83a92d9a4@kernel.org>
On 4/27/26 09:09, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
> Due to my mistake, V1 was sent twice w/o proper cover letter and
> Cc: stable. Please ignore V1. Apologies for the noise.
>
> Changes since V1:
> - used b4 to send patch series (w/ a proper cover letter) instead of
> my broken git send-email script (Thanks Vlastimil)
> - added Cc: stable to patches 1 and 2
>
> On UP kernels (!CONFIG_SMP), spin_trylock() is a no-op that
> unconditionally succeeds even when the lock is already held.
> As a result, alloc_frozen_pages_nolock() and kmalloc_nolock() called
> from an NMI context can successfully re-acquire the lock that the
> page/slab allocators are already holding (no deadlock because it's
> trylock, but leads to e.g., allocating the same page/object twice and
> causing use-after-free).
>
> It was discovered while testing the new kmalloc/kfree_nolock() test case
> in the slub_kunit test module with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y on a UP
> kernel.
>
> Patch 1 fixes alloc_frozen_pages_nolock() and
> patch 2 fixes kmalloc_nolock().
Thanks. Given the problem exposed is in a slab kunit test I think it's
better to handle this in the slab tree. The page_alloc change is small and
should not cause conflicts. So I've merged both in slab/for-next.
> Note: As pointed out by Vlastimil Babka [1], in theory a kprobe in a
> locked section could trigger the same issue. However, fixing that
> involves a non-trivial rework (e.g., inventing a new spinlock type) or
> introduces unnecessary overhead for all spinlocks on UP (e.g., let all
> spinlocks check locked status on UP).
>
> Given that BPF tracing on UP is rare, and it's even more unlikely to
> trace a function called from the memory allocator within the locked
> section, this patch series addresses the issue only on NMI contexts
> (which is rare as well but now covered by the new test case).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/af3a7fa9-b368-4ffd-964d-9e4fcba863a8@kernel.org
>
> Cc: stable.vger.kernel.org
> ---
> Harry Yoo (Oracle) (2):
> mm/page_alloc: return NULL early from alloc_frozen_pages_nolock() in NMI on UP
> mm/slab: return NULL early from kmalloc_nolock() in NMI on UP
>
> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++
> mm/slub.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> ---
> base-commit: ba24da38a519dfcff8cce3f3f2726d7b159a4d75
> change-id: 20260427-nolock-api-fix-bd056911e68e
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Cheers,
> Harry / Hyeonggon
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 7:09 [PATCH mm-hotfixes v2 0/2] mm/page_alloc,slab: return NULL early from *_nolock() memory allocation APIs in NMI on UP Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-27 7:09 ` [PATCH mm-hotfixes v2 1/2] mm/page_alloc: return NULL early from alloc_frozen_pages_nolock() " Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-27 7:09 ` [PATCH mm-hotfixes v2 2/2] mm/slab: return NULL early from kmalloc_nolock() " Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-27 8:00 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-04-27 8:13 ` [PATCH mm-hotfixes v2 0/2] mm/page_alloc,slab: return NULL early from *_nolock() memory allocation APIs " Harry Yoo (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3f7b8e4-85ae-4e80-bb02-a7b205cec88e@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox