From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
To: "Fredrik Schön" <fredrikschon@gmail.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Fredrik Schön" <fredrik.schon@gmail.com>,
"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase LSPCON timeout
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:24:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c860f332-3e91-0522-984a-e34e30f56022@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180817200728.8154-1-fredrik.schon@gmail.com>
On 8/18/2018 1:37 AM, Fredrik Schön wrote:
> 100 ms is not enough time for the LSPCON adapter on Intel NUC devices to
> settle. This causes dropped display modes at boot or screen reconfiguration.
> Empirical testing can reproduce the error up to a timeout of 190 ms. Basic
> boot and stress testing at 200 ms has not (yet) failed.
>
> Increase timeout to 400 ms to get some margin of error.
>
> Changes from v1:
> The initial suggestion of 1000 ms was lowered due to concerns about delaying
> valid timeout cases.
> Update patch metadata.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107503
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570392
> Fixes: 357c0ae9198a ("drm/i915/lspcon: Wait for expected LSPCON mode to settle")
> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.11+
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fredrik Schön <fredrik.schon@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c
> index 8ae8f42f430a..6b6758419fb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static enum drm_lspcon_mode lspcon_wait_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon,
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Waiting for LSPCON mode %s to settle\n",
> lspcon_mode_name(mode));
>
> - wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode, 100);
> + wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode, 400);
> if (current_mode != mode)
> DRM_ERROR("LSPCON mode hasn't settled\n");
>
Looks good to me
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
- Shashank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-20 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 20:07 [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase LSPCON timeout Fredrik Schön
2018-08-20 7:54 ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2018-08-20 11:27 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c860f332-3e91-0522-984a-e34e30f56022@intel.com \
--to=shashank.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=fredrik.schon@gmail.com \
--cc=fredrikschon@gmail.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox