From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org, cryptearth@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: asm1064: asm1166: don't limit reported ports
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:06:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf0a0dbe-0df9-40c3-affd-ddf9b499d03d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240313214650.2165-1-conikost@gentoo.org>
Hi,
On 3/13/24 10:46 PM, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
> Previously, patches have been added to limit the reported count of SATA
> ports for asm1064 and asm1166 SATA controllers, as those controllers do
> report more ports than physical having.
>
> Unfortunately, this causes trouble for users, which are using SATA
> controllers, which provide more ports through SATA PMP
> (Port-MultiPlier) and are now not any more recognized.
>
> This happens, as asm1064 and 1166 are handling SATA PMP transparently,
> so all non-physical ports needs to be enabled to use that feature.
>
> This patch reverts both patches for asm1064 and asm1166, so old
> behavior is restored and SATA PMP will work again, so all physical and
> non-physical ports will work again.
>
> Fixes: 0077a504e1a4 ("ahci: asm1166: correct count of reported ports")
> Fixes: 9815e3961754 ("ahci: asm1064: correct count of reported ports")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Matt <cryptearth@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org>
Thank you for the quick patch, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 13 -------------
> 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index 78570684ff68..562302e2e57c 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -669,19 +669,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(mobile_lpm_policy, "Default LPM policy for mobile chipsets");
> static void ahci_pci_save_initial_config(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
> {
> - if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA) {
> - switch (pdev->device) {
> - case 0x1166:
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ASM1166 has only six ports\n");
> - hpriv->saved_port_map = 0x3f;
> - break;
> - case 0x1064:
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ASM1064 has only four ports\n");
> - hpriv->saved_port_map = 0xf;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> -
> if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON && pdev->device == 0x2361) {
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "JMB361 has only one port\n");
> hpriv->saved_port_map = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-13 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-13 21:46 [PATCH] ahci: asm1064: asm1166: don't limit reported ports Conrad Kostecki
2024-03-13 22:06 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2024-03-19 11:45 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf0a0dbe-0df9-40c3-affd-ddf9b499d03d@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=cryptearth@googlemail.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox