public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 1/1] bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest result_unpriv outcomes
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:53:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfaedc65-9659-1c78-7bef-bf051c577fc0@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804172001.3909228-2-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>

On 04.08.2021 20:20, Ovidiu Panait wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>
> Given we don't need to simulate the speculative domain for registers with
> immediates anymore since the verifier uses direct imm-based rewrites instead
> of having to mask, we can also lift a few cases that were previously rejected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> [OP: backport to 5.4, small context adjustment in stack_ptr.c]
> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>

Hi Greg,


It seems that this patch was missed for the previous 5.4 release, could 
it be included in the upcoming release?


Thanks!

Ovidiu

> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c       | 2 --
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 8 --------
>   2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c
> index 7276620ef242..53d2a5a5ec58 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c
> @@ -291,8 +291,6 @@
>   	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
>   	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>   	},
> -	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
> -	.errstr_unpriv = "invalid stack off=0 size=1",
>   	.result = ACCEPT,
>   	.retval = 42,
>   },
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> index 28d44e6aa0b7..f9c91b95080e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> @@ -300,8 +300,6 @@
>   	},
>   	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
>   	.result = ACCEPT,
> -	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
> -	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
>   	.retval = 1,
>   },
>   {
> @@ -371,8 +369,6 @@
>   	},
>   	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
>   	.result = ACCEPT,
> -	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
> -	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
>   	.retval = 1,
>   },
>   {
> @@ -472,8 +468,6 @@
>   	},
>   	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
>   	.result = ACCEPT,
> -	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
> -	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
>   	.retval = 1,
>   },
>   {
> @@ -766,8 +760,6 @@
>   	},
>   	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
>   	.result = ACCEPT,
> -	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
> -	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
>   	.retval = 1,
>   },
>   {

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-04 17:20 [PATCH 5.4 0/1] bpf: selftests: fix verifier selftests Ovidiu Panait
2021-08-04 17:20 ` [PATCH 5.4 1/1] bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest result_unpriv outcomes Ovidiu Panait
2021-08-10  8:53   ` Ovidiu Panait [this message]
2021-08-10  9:41     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cfaedc65-9659-1c78-7bef-bf051c577fc0@windriver.com \
    --to=ovidiu.panait@windriver.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox