From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>,
Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>,
Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@vivo.com>, Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: validate nameoff for all dirents in erofs_fill_dentries()
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d373198b-d32a-49f4-9044-63c7b474f2ea@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SYBPR01MB78819C794EC3532E5E7FCB3CAF252@SYBPR01MB7881.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Junrui,
On 2026/4/14 23:20, Junrui Luo wrote:
> erofs_readdir() validates de[0].nameoff before calling
> erofs_fill_dentries(), but subsequent dirents are used without
> validation. The loop computes `maxsize - nameoff` as an unsigned int
> to bound strnlen().
The issue is true, but I don't think the description is valid.
I think what we missed is to check the last dirent nameoff vs
maxsize.
BTW, please don't "To" too many people (especially Miao Xie
and Greg), basically I think you only need to post to people
according to `./checkpoint.pl` but leave indivudual person
into "Cc" instead.
>
> If a crafted EROFS image has a dirent with nameoff >= maxsize, the
> subtraction underflows, causing strnlen() to read past the block
> buffer.
>
> Fix by validating each entry's nameoff at the top of the loop: it
> must be >= nameoff0 and <= maxsize.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 3aa8ec716e52 ("staging: erofs: add directory operations")
> Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/dir.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/dir.c b/fs/erofs/dir.c
> index e5132575b9d3..2efa16fa162f 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/dir.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ static int erofs_fill_dentries(struct inode *dir, struct dir_context *ctx,
> const char *de_name = (char *)dentry_blk + nameoff;
> unsigned int de_namelen;
>
> + if (nameoff < nameoff0 || nameoff > maxsize) {
> + erofs_err(dir->i_sb, "bogus dirent @ nid %llu",
> + EROFS_I(dir)->nid);
> + DBG_BUGON(1);
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + }
I think the only thing we need is the following diff:
[The reason why nameoff < nameoff0 is unneeded, since
`de_namelen > EROFS_NAME_LEN` ensures the nameoff delta
won't be negative (so nameoff will increase.)
and `nameoff + de_namelen > maxsize` implies
`nameoff > maxsize` so `nameoff > maxsize` is unneeded too.]
diff --git a/fs/erofs/dir.c b/fs/erofs/dir.c
index e5132575b9d3..e0666d6da9af 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/dir.c
@@ -20,19 +20,18 @@ static int erofs_fill_dentries(struct inode *dir, struct dir_context *ctx,
unsigned int de_namelen;
/* the last dirent in the block? */
- if (de + 1 >= end)
+ if (de + 1 >= end) {
+ if (maxsize <= nameoff)
+ goto err_bogus;
de_namelen = strnlen(de_name, maxsize - nameoff);
- else
+ } else {
de_namelen = le16_to_cpu(de[1].nameoff) - nameoff;
+ }
/* a corrupted entry is found */
if (nameoff + de_namelen > maxsize ||
- de_namelen > EROFS_NAME_LEN) {
- erofs_err(dir->i_sb, "bogus dirent @ nid %llu",
- EROFS_I(dir)->nid);
- DBG_BUGON(1);
- return -EFSCORRUPTED;
- }
+ de_namelen > EROFS_NAME_LEN)
+ goto err_bogus;
if (!dir_emit(ctx, de_name, de_namelen,
erofs_nid_to_ino64(EROFS_SB(dir->i_sb),
@@ -42,6 +41,10 @@ static int erofs_fill_dentries(struct inode *dir, struct dir_context *ctx,
ctx->pos += sizeof(struct erofs_dirent);
}
return 0;
+err_bogus:
+ erofs_err(dir->i_sb, "bogus dirent @ nid %llu", EROFS_I(dir)->nid);
+ DBG_BUGON(1);
+ return -EFSCORRUPTED;
}
static int erofs_readdir(struct file *f, struct dir_context *ctx)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> +
> /* the last dirent in the block? */
> if (de + 1 >= end)
> de_namelen = strnlen(de_name, maxsize - nameoff);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 7aaa8047eafd0bd628065b15757d9b48c5f9c07d
> change-id: 20260414-fixes-ae20cd389f52
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 15:20 [PATCH] erofs: validate nameoff for all dirents in erofs_fill_dentries() Junrui Luo
2026-04-14 15:26 ` Junrui Luo
2026-04-14 16:00 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2026-04-14 16:18 ` Gao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d373198b-d32a-49f4-9044-63c7b474f2ea@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=danisjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=dhavale@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guochunhai@vivo.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=lihongbo22@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=moonafterrain@outlook.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
--cc=zbestahu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox