stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
	socketpair@gmail.com,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pipe: make pipe user buffer limit checks more precise
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:07:43 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dabb43e9-a1c9-5e11-6190-37f864131c98@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db82480c-7956-b89d-1f4e-ba2c94f4067e@gmail.com>

Andrew,

Thanks for picking up this patch series in -mm. Please drop it.
After discussions with Vegard, I have something better now.

Cheers,

Michael


On 08/16/2016 11:14 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> As currently implemented, when creating a new pipe or increasing
> a pipe's capacity with fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ), the checks against
> the limits in /proc/sys/fs/pipe-user-pages-{soft,hard} (added by
> commit 759c01142a5d0) do not include the pages required for the
> new pipe or increased capacity.  In the case of fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ),
> this means that an unprivileged user can make a one-time capacity
> increase that pushes the user consumption over the limits by up
> to the value specified in /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size (which
> defaults to 1 MiB, but might be set to a much higher value).
> 
> This patch remedies the problem by including the capacity required
> for the new pipe or the pipe capacity increase in the check against
> the limit.
> 
> There is a small chance that this change could break user-space,
> since there are cases where pipe() and fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ) calls
> that previously succeeded might fail. However, the chances are
> small, since (a) the pipe-user-pages-{soft,hard} limits are new
> (in 4.5), and the default soft/hard limits are high/unlimited.
> Therefore, it seems warranted to make these limits operate more
> precisely (and behave more like what users probably expect).
> 
> Using the test program shown in the previous patch, on an unpatched
> kernel, we first set some limits:
> 
>     # echo 0 > /proc/sys/fs/pipe-user-pages-soft
>     # echo 1000000000 > /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size
>     # echo 10000 > /proc/sys/fs/pipe-user-pages-hard    # 40.96 MB
> 
> Then show that we can set a pipe with capacity (100MB) that is
> over the hard limit
> 
>     # sudo -u mtk ./test_F_SETPIPE_SZ 1 100000000
>     Loop 1: set pipe capacity to 100000000 bytes
>         F_SETPIPE_SZ returned 134217728
> 
> Now set the capacity to 100MB twice. The second call fails (which is
> probably surprising to most users, since it seems like a no-op):
> 
>     # sudo -u mtk ./test_F_SETPIPE_SZ 1 100000000 0 100000000
>     Loop 1: set pipe capacity to 100000000 bytes
>         F_SETPIPE_SZ returned 134217728
>     Loop 2: set pipe capacity to 100000000 bytes
>         Loop 2, pipe 0: F_SETPIPE_SZ failed: fcntl: Operation not permitted
> 
> With a patched kernel, setting a capacity over the limit fails at the
> first attempt:
> 
>     # echo 0 > /proc/sys/fs/pipe-user-pages-soft
>     # echo 1000000000 > /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size
>     # echo 10000 > /proc/sys/fs/pipe-user-pages-hard
>     # sudo -u mtk ./test_F_SETPIPE_SZ 1 100000000
>         Loop 1: set pipe capacity to 100000000 bytes
>             Loop 1, pipe 0: F_SETPIPE_SZ failed: fcntl: Operation not permitted
> 
> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
> Cc: socketpair@gmail.com
> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/pipe.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
> index a98ebca..397d8d9 100644
> --- a/fs/pipe.c
> +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> @@ -610,16 +610,20 @@ static void account_pipe_buffers(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>  	atomic_long_add(new - old, &pipe->user->pipe_bufs);
>  }
>  
> -static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(struct user_struct *user)
> +static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(struct user_struct *user,
> +				       unsigned int nr_pages)
>  {
>  	return pipe_user_pages_soft &&
> -	       atomic_long_read(&user->pipe_bufs) >= pipe_user_pages_soft;
> +	       atomic_long_read(&user->pipe_bufs) + nr_pages >=
> +			pipe_user_pages_soft;
>  }
>  
> -static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(struct user_struct *user)
> +static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(struct user_struct *user,
> +				       unsigned int nr_pages)
>  {
>  	return pipe_user_pages_hard &&
> -	       atomic_long_read(&user->pipe_bufs) >= pipe_user_pages_hard;
> +	       atomic_long_read(&user->pipe_bufs) + nr_pages >=
> +			pipe_user_pages_hard;
>  }
>  
>  struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(void)
> @@ -631,13 +635,13 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(void)
>  		unsigned long pipe_bufs = PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS;
>  		struct user_struct *user = get_current_user();
>  
> -		if (!too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user)) {
> -			if (too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user))
> -				pipe_bufs = 1;
> +		if (too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user, PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS))
> +			pipe_bufs = 1;
> +
> +		if (!too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user, pipe_bufs))
>  			pipe->bufs = kcalloc(pipe_bufs,
>  					     sizeof(struct pipe_buffer),
>  					     GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> -		}
>  
>  		if (pipe->bufs) {
>  			init_waitqueue_head(&pipe->wait);
> @@ -1132,8 +1136,8 @@ long pipe_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  			if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && size > pipe_max_size) {
>  				ret = -EPERM;
>  				goto out;
> -			} else if ((too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(pipe->user) ||
> -				too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(pipe->user)) &&
> +			} else if ((too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(pipe->user, nr_pages) ||
> +				too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(pipe->user, nr_pages)) &&
>  				!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
>  				!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
>  				ret = -EPERM;
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-19  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-16 11:10 [PATCH 1/2] pipe: check limits only when increasing pipe capacity Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-16 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] pipe: make pipe user buffer limit checks more precise Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-16 12:07   ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-16 20:21     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-16 22:00       ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-17  8:02         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-17 19:34           ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-17 19:41             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-17 19:51               ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-19  5:07   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2016-08-16 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] pipe: check limits only when increasing pipe capacity Vegard Nossum
2016-08-19  5:07 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dabb43e9-a1c9-5e11-6190-37f864131c98@gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=socketpair@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).