From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in save state whenever XFD[i]=1
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:27:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dde77ed7-3fde-4b81-85be-68db82138454@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43474e30-6a14-4ab1-aa2c-5f079503637d@redhat.com>
On 1/15/26 08:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
...
>> I'm _sure_ they discussed tying XFD[i] and XINUSE[i] together and there
>> was a good reason they did not.
>
> Is there anything that prevents an SMM handler (or more likely, an SMI
> transfer monitor) to do an XSAVE/XRSTOR and destroy tile data?
I think you're saying: let's assume XFD[18]=1 and XINUSE[18]=1 and
there's an SMI. The SMI handler does:
XSAVE(RFBM=-1, &buf)
... run some gunk
XRSTOR(RFBM=-1, &buf)
to try and save everything. But, that XSAVE is subject to this behavior
from the SDM:
If XSAVE, XSAVEC, XSAVEOPT, or XSAVES is saving the state
component i, the instruction does not generate #NM when XCR0[i]
= IA32_XFD[i] = 1; instead, it operates as if XINUSE[i] = 0 (and
the state component was in its initial state)
So 'buf' will end up having XFEATURES[18]=0. The XRSTOR will see
XFEATURES[18]=0 and set feature 18 to its init state, effectively
zapping its contents.
I guess the only thing preventing that in practice is the lack of XSAVE
use in SMM handlers. But I see your point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-15 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260101090516.316883-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
2026-01-01 9:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in save state whenever XFD[i]=1 Paolo Bonzini
2026-01-03 2:06 ` Yao Yuan
2026-01-05 17:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-06 5:25 ` Yao Yuan
2026-01-06 0:54 ` Jim Mattson
2026-01-06 1:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-06 17:56 ` Jim Mattson
2026-01-15 16:07 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-15 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-01-15 16:27 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2026-01-07 0:28 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-01-07 22:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-01-08 3:06 ` Binbin Wu
2026-01-08 16:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-01-15 15:54 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-15 16:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-01-01 9:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests: kvm: replace numbered sync points with actions Paolo Bonzini
2026-01-06 0:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-07 22:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-01-08 20:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-01 9:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests: kvm: try getting XFD and XSAVE state out of sync Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dde77ed7-3fde-4b81-85be-68db82138454@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox