From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Only handle IOPF for SVA when PRI is supported
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:08:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e02def98-ffa4-4467-b008-4652607b0d84@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310075520.295104-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On 3/10/2026 3:55 PM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> In intel_svm_set_dev_pasid(), the driver unconditionally manages the IOPF
> handling during a domain transition. However, commit a86fb7717320
> ("iommu/vt-d: Allow SVA with device-specific IOPF") introduced support for
> SVA on devices that handle page faults internally without utilizing the
> PCI PRI. On such devices, the IOMMU-side IOPF infrastructure is not
> required. Calling iopf_for_domain_replace() on these devices is incorrect
> and can lead to unexpected failures during PASID attachment or unwinding.
>
> Add a check for info->pri_supported to ensure that the IOPF queue logic
> is only invoked for devices that actually rely on the IOMMU's PRI-based
> fault handling.
>
> Fixes: 17fce9d2336d ("iommu/vt-d: Put iopf enablement in domain attach path")
> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Queued for v7.0-rc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 7:55 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Only handle IOPF for SVA when PRI is supported Lu Baolu
2026-03-16 1:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-03-17 1:08 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e02def98-ffa4-4467-b008-4652607b0d84@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox