From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5CAE743D3 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229654AbjI2ALV (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 20:11:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229541AbjI2ALV (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 20:11:21 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC0F92; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:11:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1695946279; x=1727482279; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gjkSVOUjK8t1WLURW1YR+vElGQY+naItEdlppoHYujM=; b=Q4qCXFgV4Fa6QLjLwMj8GiSms2OFihc7O0WiLRcSzb7RlEcb0O+XbuBZ IZQgsic/2hdibxe3Rz5wKI8PL7dZ1FQZbMU4svknDb+A6g/c4vx0SHC6q ObFXVQfXEZEYivcZN9EUVuw+Q73TeaU9NtRxVuGWCGkx2iO8oNv4D0Wfu xQApaNrZcZ/ar8QmZE0aXp9PXGu8mm23f4QS9jqL1FuoVCaQZ337xOOCz KhdOZt4WcPLXuGGON4xg3gtEpi+MvcTq4toHFRPVBQ/xOvMGU8dRv3N2R 3Eczk2Aud+6wLUB9+ogZ9hUvLhQOi/ekQwqTbBW2u6bFF1TZZ7vHuedk3 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10847"; a="379475787" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,185,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="379475787" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Sep 2023 17:11:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10847"; a="873486737" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,185,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="873486737" Received: from jveerasa-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.231.134]) ([10.255.231.134]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Sep 2023 17:11:11 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:11:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86/sgx: Resolves SECS reclaim vs. page fault for EAUG race Content-Language: en-US To: Reinette Chatre , Haitao Huang , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: kristen@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, sohil.mehta@intel.com References: <20230728051024.33063-1-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 9/28/23 16:08, Reinette Chatre wrote: > I'd like to check in on the status of this patch. This two month old > patch looks to be a needed fix and has Jarkko and Kai's review tags, > but I am not able to find it queued or merged in tip or upstream. > Apologies if I did not look in the right spot, I just want to make > sure it did not fall through the cracks if deemed needed. It fell through the cracks. Sorry about that. It's in x86/urgent now.