From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1494C61DA3 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231396AbjBUHqc (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 02:46:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41652 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229697AbjBUHqc (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 02:46:32 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE821A66E for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 23:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwepemm600017.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4PLWWM34mCznWNm; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:43:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.179.234] (10.174.179.234) by kwepemm600017.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.234) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.17; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:46:27 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:46:27 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: Consultation on backport 97e3d26b5e5f("x86/mm: Randomize per-cpu entry area") to stable To: Greg KH CC: , , , Dave Hansen , , , References: <2b814e48-d304-e48a-e4b4-c39a10d2dbf4@huawei.com> From: Tong Tiangen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.179.234] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemm600017.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.234) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 在 2023/2/21 15:30, Greg KH 写道: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:19:05PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote: >> Hi peter: >> >> Do you have any plans to backport this patch[1] to the stable branch of the >> lower version, such as 4.19.y ? > > Why? That is a new feature for 6.2 why would it be needed to fix > anything in really old kernels? Hi Greg: This patch fix CVE-2023-0597[1], this CVE report a flaw possibility of memory leak. And this is important for some products using this stable version. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165926 > >> When I try to backport this patch to 5.10.y, I met some KASAN[2] and >> KASLR[3] related issues. Although they were finally solved, there were still >> some detours in the process. > > Send your series of backports to the list for review please if they > match the stable kernel rules. OK. > > But why can't you just use the 6.2 kernel instead of something obsolete > like 4.19? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > . Thanks. Tong .