From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FCDC4321E for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 15:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229908AbiLDP4K (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 10:56:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58318 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229753AbiLDP4I (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 10:56:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D3A13D70 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 07:56:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id p18so3333978qkg.2 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 07:56:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ymxb9P0IjaxkkgKVbX6h7FxkgCqELgbUOIk2uateazM=; b=cVlmRloO4KNhNRrJ63bRjLA13sTnnbulFLVFURZ33x90IiP0Kt4zYLx7438l15k6Il T1sFgex4nd3dgVNBGFDg3wphlvnA8nSsBmSd/rakfg+Sdt5newA6wcvknuPi39QPnkCR /4UCaZCbwnFEuC50dJvo7AAquprObV6SAFbIy/tb6UWrhN1BUhbfFyJbaUvUMqE/x7oR mbLeIopRbc6asTNB5CW2B8CSykyKkCvAH5imkoz/KR/p2NFSaq5p2PXHdoPaG0vvkeMO 0ZAerAr5K49Fij96V7b/ct8wzZGegscRki/+jtQFpJlVN30rLOvL/3LJ7ugctn3pkhq0 sddg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ymxb9P0IjaxkkgKVbX6h7FxkgCqELgbUOIk2uateazM=; b=kpKndj7Uwx4C1+IfQ39ruTWYAZrEMxLJOcS15KUckuSuvzHvOxPVQPIynEGTZBGyVP 8UrLXxcudlghu6YmB+ydSJf/ACH/XpAu2n1JHtjpu4WnRUUEa4iQ1DGGdkx2jeWF1oSk MYpv0TQMBIanIYDtKmJhbz40UuUtH8XNMnM2kMydAAd2Q6yohxD5p/M/ZnLpPTQIqgbg wN7x3r9yEt4lNsGrHzgL9zQc3nT1o9+PK4tEeZ1DXXmjOygDgIGasYBPbF3jvC6yHBXV e5oCNFqi8etzAUZxLGKhbc0DllebunXguzD8rWbYp88ER9+h7cFDPrKKEkExP6krv59k uADw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnXov4z8f/Zj7Vzqt70zpCwG/viOuRLVW/Q8RN1nfhSqw/mZwkB eDlNBiZ+5u1VUdBQ62hqEuV3XA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6gCQUk4Zkn69FtuBXcBs5H3jj6g8nCuhuHwMPCyK6VBX7d9hPjDPz8CKyc3kK8wBUIASjdNw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:31a9:b0:6fb:c632:f915 with SMTP id bi41-20020a05620a31a900b006fbc632f915mr55217860qkb.492.1670169362509; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 07:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ripple.attlocal.net (172-10-233-147.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [172.10.233.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az15-20020a05620a170f00b006ce1bfbd603sm10117567qkb.124.2022.12.04.07.56.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 04 Dec 2022 07:56:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 07:55:51 -0800 (PST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@ripple.attlocal.net To: Greg Kroah-Hartman cc: Hugh Dickins , Nathan Chancellor , Sasha Levin , llvm@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 and earlier only] mm: Fix '.data.once' orphan section warning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20221128225345.9383-1-nathan@kernel.org> <5f9317c7-e899-a6b2-dd23-664a1b6d629@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 4 Dec 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 09:41:34AM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 03:53:46PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > > > > As far as I can tell, this should be applied to 5.4 and earlier. It > > > > should apply cleanly but let me know if not. > > > > > > Queued up everywhere, thanks. > > > > Thanks for queueing them up, Greg, but please read through the thread: > > I have doubts on the 4.14 and 4.9 ones, which would want a different patch > > if we're going to make any change; but thought we could just leave those > > trees without the patch, and Nathan agreed. > > Oops, sorry, now dropped from 4.14 and 4.9 and I left the 4.19 one as > that one was ok to keep, right? That's right, the 5.4 and the 4.19 ones are straightforward. It was just the 4.14 and 4.9 ones which were questionable (because of other related infrastructure missing), so better dropped. Thanks, Hugh