Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Jiajie Hao (郝加节)" <jiajie.hao@mediatek.com>,
	"CC Chou (周志杰)" <cc.chou@mediatek.com>,
	"Eddie Huang (黃智傑)" <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	"Alice Chao (趙珮均)" <Alice.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	"quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	"Ed Tsai (蔡宗軒)" <Ed.Tsai@mediatek.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Lin Gui (桂林)" <Lin.Gui@mediatek.com>,
	"Chun-Hung Wu (巫駿宏)" <Chun-hung.Wu@mediatek.com>,
	"Tun-yu Yu (游敦聿)" <Tun-yu.Yu@mediatek.com>,
	"Chaotian Jing (井朝天)" <Chaotian.Jing@mediatek.com>,
	"Powen Kao (高伯文)" <Powen.Kao@mediatek.com>,
	"Naomi Chu (朱詠田)" <Naomi.Chu@mediatek.com>,
	"Qilin Tan (谭麒麟)" <Qilin.Tan@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ufs: core: requeue aborted request
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:39:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec301d5f-cfee-41ce-ae1a-5679b2da2cce@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f9e2ac99bcb981b11dc6454165818c5de6fd4d6.camel@mediatek.com>

On 9/19/24 7:02 PM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-09-19 at 11:49 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> For legacy and MCQ mode, I prefer the following behavior for
>> ufshcd_abort_all():
>> * ufshcd_compl_one_cqe() ignores commands with status OCS_ABORTED.
>> * ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd() is called either by ufshcd_abort_one() or
>>     by ufshcd_abort_all().
>>
>> Do you agree with making the changes proposed above?
> 
> This might not work, as SDB mode doesn't ignore
> OCS: INVALID_OCS_VALUE but rather notifies SCSI to requeue.

cmd->result should be ignored for aborted commands. Hence,
how OCS_INVALID_COMMAND_STATUS is translated by
ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status() is not relevant for aborted commands.

> So what we need to correct is to notify SCSI to requeue
> when MCQ mode receives OCS: ABORTED as well.

Unless the host controller violates the UFSHCI specification, the
command status is not set for aborted commands in legacy mode. Let's
keep the code uniform for legacy mode, MCQ mode, compliant and non-
ompliant controllers and not rely on the command status for aborted
commands.

Thanks,

Bart.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-20 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240910073035.25974-1-peter.wang@mediatek.com>
2024-09-10  7:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ufs: core: fix the issue of ICU failure peter.wang
2024-09-10  7:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ufs: core: requeue aborted request peter.wang
2024-09-10 17:59   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-11  6:03     ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-09-11 19:11       ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-12 13:31         ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-09-12 21:17           ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-13  7:10             ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-09-13 17:41               ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-18 13:29                 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-09-18 18:29                   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-19 12:16                     ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-09-19 18:49                       ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-20  2:02                         ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-09-20 18:39                           ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-09-23  7:06                             ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-09-14 16:13       ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-18 13:30         ` Peter Wang (王信友)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ec301d5f-cfee-41ce-ae1a-5679b2da2cce@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=Alice.Chao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Chaotian.Jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Chun-hung.Wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Ed.Tsai@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Lin.Gui@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Naomi.Chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Powen.Kao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Qilin.Tan@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Tun-yu.Yu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=cc.chou@mediatek.com \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiajie.hao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox