From: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
To: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
"Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
"Xiao Wang" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Andy Chiu" <andy.chiu@sifive.com>,
"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@google.com>,
"Greentime Hu" <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Costa Shulyupin" <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>,
"Anup Patel" <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
"Zong Li" <zong.li@sifive.com>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Erick Archer" <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] RISC-V: Check scalar unaligned access on all CPUs
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:25:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed410b0f-0062-4fbb-97e0-86fd492fb5ca@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALs-HsvE9PzTrhVO0umh3KaJuLQLdk-h8sYKBg7XA4a-MXAmOg@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/10/24 11:55, Evan Green wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 5:51 PM Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Originally, the check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus function
>> only checked the boot hart. This fixes the function to check all
>> harts.
>>
>> Fixes: 71c54b3d169d ("riscv: report misaligned accesses emulation to hwprobe")
>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> V1 -> V2:
>> - New patch
>> V2 -> V3:
>> - Split patch
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
>> index b62d5a2f4541..8fadbe00dd62 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
>> @@ -526,31 +526,17 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu)
>> +static void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *unused)
>> {
>> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> long *mas_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&misaligned_access_speed, cpu);
>> unsigned long tmp_var, tmp_val;
>> - bool misaligned_emu_detected;
>>
>> *mas_ptr = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
>>
>> __asm__ __volatile__ (
>> " "REG_L" %[tmp], 1(%[ptr])\n"
>> : [tmp] "=r" (tmp_val) : [ptr] "r" (&tmp_var) : "memory");
>> -
>> - misaligned_emu_detected = (*mas_ptr == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED);
>> - /*
>> - * If unaligned_ctl is already set, this means that we detected that all
>> - * CPUS uses emulated misaligned access at boot time. If that changed
>> - * when hotplugging the new cpu, this is something we don't handle.
>> - */
>> - if (unlikely(unaligned_ctl && !misaligned_emu_detected)) {
>> - pr_crit("CPU misaligned accesses non homogeneous (expected all emulated)\n");
>> - while (true)
>> - cpu_relax();
>> - }
>
> This chunk was meant to detect and refuse to run on a system where a
> heterogeneous CPU is hotplugged into a previously homogenous system.
> The commit message doesn't mention this change, how come you
> deleted it?
Sorry for the long wait.
I do not remember why I removed this.
Your right it shouldn't be removed, I added it back.
Thanks,
Jesse Taube
>
>
>> -
>> - return misaligned_emu_detected;
>> }
>>
>> bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
>> @@ -562,8 +548,11 @@ bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
>> * accesses emulated since tasks requesting such control can run on any
>> * CPU.
>> */
>> + schedule_on_each_cpu(check_unaligned_access_emulated);
>> +
>> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>> - if (!check_unaligned_access_emulated(cpu))
>> + if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu)
>> + != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED)
>> return false;
>>
>> unaligned_ctl = true;
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240625005001.37901-1-jesse@rivosinc.com>
2024-06-25 0:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] RISC-V: Check scalar unaligned access on all CPUs Jesse Taube
2024-07-10 15:55 ` Evan Green
2024-07-11 20:25 ` Jesse Taube [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed410b0f-0062-4fbb-97e0-86fd492fb5ca@rivosinc.com \
--to=jesse@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=costa.shul@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox