From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net (004.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E981DDA00 for ; Sun, 4 May 2025 17:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746379089; cv=none; b=JQkNa9DLD2CLeFafSxZaF6NOKM8eN04giVUkGiShWSXb7ZkkXPIj9aMgdafM622J09HwNkV0qUclRQfGbldYyOy+DOCPbC/6c/gJCxgw6JYrh88/vPIEysE+LbtgrDCO/bDGOfZzDHQn5gadBg3bdwGfhfVKhd1MPWVJbeJCYFo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746379089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CdvLne7i5IYq79xXte5THCZ7ybAIKa+F9DQBiwQ3S0k=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=t6qR9alE/WU+3gG5y79/BGtXkLNbTfIGlaXfvu9izi5Io98B+TwYQi1ehE7ZeaCf6+QUOc5k10+XVXQZh44Q3JCzT91qG+RNfIAtR1U/cTrxfnFCzVly+2JADNesFHcSq3yr1ZaiBfQ7GZSh0OUy+YzARWRUC+PQx2RkXTLtfHs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=2s3BJqNT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="2s3BJqNT" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZrB8x3JZZzm0yVY; Sun, 4 May 2025 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1746378864; x=1748970865; bh=8bzTeEJKNHHiV/xidXJRqCxW 4HfVFwiwPa0MkO4/ZHM=; b=2s3BJqNTYWd/hEuF48TsjzlXrAy5/wVJetllhJ5h t4uLlrTc1GFByCJIcOx7909rcfo8QkhKiCubnlPqQnCICdfjsQvWTloCgA/B3Zz2 eP0ZWIepC/cNnC0IwE1xTpDB2pVGP3uhnYTobOnnno7RTXywZcDpCmh5U/YyL/ro LszIQyFKV/BPDt0+uTKnE5vyi1f2MkVw7jM8ram5TBpUtmVsJrFm5UoEPIx2epkH As/3SyaVsf9rCkJbtpRO7YNviuUyZTD1NYUCUbc54Io+mnnxY8zH3qmxboQwJsX7 8Jtje5u90hUXfP+8VC9CXy8hUgRY2ktHMI7i6WfcpCFjeQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (004.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id o5Cx2BFtI3S5; Sun, 4 May 2025 17:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.51.14] (c-73-231-117-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.117.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZrB8q6CwHzm0yQj; Sun, 4 May 2025 17:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 10:14:17 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Preserve the request order in the block layer To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Damien Le Moal , Jaegeuk Kim References: <20250418175401.1936152-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <2025042223-subsiding-parka-b064@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <2025042223-subsiding-parka-b064@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/22/25 4:51 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:53:58AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> In kernel v6.10 the zoned storage approach was changed from zoned write >> locking to zone write plugging. Because of this change the block layer >> must preserve the request order. Hence this backport of Christoph's >> "don't reorder requests passed to ->queue_rqs" patch series. Please >> consider this patch series for inclusion in the 6.12 stable kernel. >> >> See also https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20241113152050.157179-1-hch@lst.de/. > > You sent this twice, right? I'll grab this "second" version as I'm > guessing they were the same? (took the past two weeks off) Hi Greg, stable@vger.kernel.org was not Cc-ed the first time I sent this series, hence the resend. Both series are indeed identical. Thank you, Bart.