Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com>,
	Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-rc 1/2] IB/core: Only enforce security for InfiniBand
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 13:15:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f60834d5-1a48-55f2-271d-de5b34966233@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171121163454.GW18825@mtr-leonro.local>

On 11/21/2017 11:34 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:04:42AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:37:27AM -0600, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
>>
>>> The only warning that would make sense is if the mixed ports aren't
>>> all IB or RoCE. As you note, CX-3 can mix those two, we don't want to
>>> see warnings about that.
>>
>> I would really like to see cx3 be changed to not do that, then we
>> could finalize this issue upstream: All device ports must be the same
>> protocol.
>
> I don't see the point of such artificial limitation, the users who
> brought CX-3 have option to work in mixed mode and IMHO it is not right
> to deprecate such ability just because it is hard for us to code for it.
>
We use cx-3 (& cx-4 & cx-5) in mixed mode all over our RDMA cluster.
Loosing that feature is not an option.

> Thanks
>
>>
>> Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-21 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20171121102618.31216-1-leon@kernel.org>
2017-11-21 10:26 ` [PATCH rdma-rc 1/2] IB/core: Only enforce security for InfiniBand Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-21 10:44   ` Mark Bloch
2017-11-21 13:22     ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-21 13:56       ` Mark Bloch
2017-11-21 15:14         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-21 15:33           ` Mark Bloch
2017-11-21 15:36             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-21 15:37             ` Daniel Jurgens
2017-11-21 16:04               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-21 16:34                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-21 16:36                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-21 16:48                     ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-21 17:10                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-21 18:16                       ` Don Dutile
2017-11-21 18:57                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-21 20:40                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-21 18:15                   ` Don Dutile [this message]
2017-11-21 13:56     ` Daniel Jurgens
2017-11-22 16:49   ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f60834d5-1a48-55f2-271d-de5b34966233@redhat.com \
    --to=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=danielj@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markb@mellanox.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox