stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Willy Tarreau' <w@1wt.eu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Feedback on 4.9 performance after PTI fixes
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 17:26:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdaddeb70a924e499fe9ee64c61fd9ed@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180107101856.GA9590@1wt.eu>

From: Willy Tarreau
> Sent: 07 January 2018 10:19
...
> The impact inside VMs is quite big but it's not where we usuall install
> processes sensitive to syscall performance. I could find an even higher
> impact on a packet generation program dropping from 2.5 Mpps to 600kpps
> in the VM after the fix, but it doesn't make much sense to do this in
> VMs so I don't really care.

Why not?
It will be related to the cost of sending (and probably receiving)
network traffic in a VM.
This is something that is done a lot.

Maybe not packet generation, but a UDP/IP benchmark inside a VM would
be sensible.
It may well be that moderate ethernet packet rates cause a massive
performance drop when the host kernel has PTI enabled.

	David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-08 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-07 10:18 Feedback on 4.9 performance after PTI fixes Willy Tarreau
2018-01-08 17:07 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2018-01-08 17:21   ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2018-01-08 18:26   ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-08 20:26     ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2018-01-08 20:39       ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-08 22:45         ` Pavlos Parissis
2018-01-08 17:26 ` David Laight [this message]
2018-01-09  7:09 ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fdaddeb70a924e499fe9ee64c61fd9ed@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).