Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, lukasz.czechowski@thaumatec.com,
	heiko@sntech.de
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable DMA for uart5 on px30-ringneck" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff3a6ebe-1723-4879-8c17-561c9ea5b9c4@cherry.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025022438-automated-recycled-cc12@gregkh>

Hi Greg, Heiko, Lukasz,

On 2/24/25 11:27 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> 
> To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
> 
> git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
> git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> git cherry-pick -x 5ae4dca718eacd0a56173a687a3736eb7e627c77
> # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> git commit -s
> git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025022438-automated-recycled-cc12@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
> 
> Possible dependencies:
> 

Commit 5ae4dca718ea ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable DMA for uart5 on 
px30-ringneck") depends on 4eee627ea593 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Move 
uart5 pin configuration to px30 ringneck SoM"), both slated for stable, 
so I'm surprised this patch is the one conflicting and not the first one 
(because it does conflict too!).

An option for clean application is to backport 5963d97aa780 ("arm64: 
dts: rockchip: add rs485 support on uart5 of px30-ringneck-haikou") to 
6.6 first, and then 4eee627ea593 followed by 5ae4dca718ea.

Another option is to resolve the conflict for 4eee627ea593 which is 
simply about the git context (rts-gpios can be removed if 5963d97aa780 
isn't backported).

@Heiko, @Greg, a preference on one of those two options (or a third one 
maybe?)? I personally would prefer the additional backport so we avoid 
other conflicts in the future (I already foresee one with a patch I 
posted (not merged yet!) last week).

Cheers,
Quentin

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 10:27 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable DMA for uart5 on px30-ringneck" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-02-24 10:46 ` Quentin Schulz [this message]
2025-02-24 12:50   ` Greg KH
2025-02-25 11:43 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable DMA for uart5 on px30-ringneck Quentin Schulz
2025-02-25 16:13   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff3a6ebe-1723-4879-8c17-561c9ea5b9c4@cherry.de \
    --to=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lukasz.czechowski@thaumatec.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox