From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: "Nitin Gote" <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix UAF in xe_gem_prime_import() on attach failure
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 11:46:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff4a02f0-5a59-4bad-af76-3d71146f136e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601101536.1333480-2-nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
On 01/06/2026 11:15, Nitin Gote wrote:
> xe_dma_buf_create_obj() creates the importer BO with obj->resv
> pointing at the exporter's dma_buf->resv. When dma_buf_dynamic_attach()
> fails, no dma_buf reference is held so the exporter can be freed
> immediately. Since ttm_bo_release() now always defers cleanup for
> ttm_bo_type_sg BOs to the TTM workqueue, the worker later calls
> dma_resv_lock() on the already-freed exporter resv, causing a UAF.
>
> Reset obj->resv to the BO's private _resv before calling xe_bo_put()
> in the error path. The BO is not yet published (attach failed) and
> carries no fences, so the switch is safe.
>
> Observed with igt@xe_live_ktest@xe_dma_buf_kunit on BMG (QEMU):
>
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b9c
> Workqueue: ttm ttm_bo_delayed_delete [ttm]
> RIP: 0010:mutex_can_spin_on_owner+0x3f/0xc0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x2dd/0x18e0
> ? ttm_bo_delayed_delete+0x41/0xc0 [ttm]
> ww_mutex_lock+0x3c/0xb0
> ttm_bo_delayed_delete+0x41/0xc0 [ttm]
> process_one_work+0x239/0x740
> worker_thread+0x200/0x3f0
> kthread+0x10d/0x150
> ret_from_fork+0x3bd/0x470
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/work_items/8023
> Fixes: d99fbd9aab62 ("drm/ttm: Always take the bo delayed cleanup path for imported bos")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.8+
> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> index 8a920e58245c..6d944bd4065c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,14 @@ struct drm_gem_object *xe_gem_prime_import(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> attach = dma_buf_dynamic_attach(dma_buf, dev->dev, attach_ops, obj);
> if (IS_ERR(attach)) {
> + /*
> + * The BO was created with resv = dma_buf->resv (exporter's
> + * resv). Since attach failed, no dma_buf reference is held and
> + * the exporter may be freed before TTM's delayed_delete worker
> + * runs. Switch to the BO's own resv to prevent a UAF when
> + * ttm_bo_delayed_delete() tries to lock the stale pointer.
> + */
> + obj->resv = &obj->_resv;
+Christian, does amdgpu not have the type of same issue here? Also any
thoughts here?
> xe_bo_put(gem_to_xe_bo(obj));
> return ERR_CAST(attach);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 10:15 [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix UAF in xe_gem_prime_import() on attach failure Nitin Gote
2026-06-01 10:46 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-06-01 11:39 ` Christian König
2026-06-01 12:01 ` Matthew Auld
2026-06-01 12:17 ` Christian König
2026-06-01 15:27 ` Gote, Nitin R
2026-06-04 4:54 ` Gote, Nitin R
2026-06-04 11:14 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-06-04 11:32 ` Matthew Auld
2026-06-04 11:55 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-06-05 9:56 ` Christian König
2026-06-11 13:04 ` Gote, Nitin R
2026-06-11 14:06 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-06-05 10:11 ` Christian König
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-04 10:23 Nitin Gote
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff4a02f0-5a59-4bad-af76-3d71146f136e@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=nitin.r.gote@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox