From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: ops: Shift tested values in snd_soc_put_volsw() by +min
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:55:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hy221y6md.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215130645.164025-1-marex@denx.de>
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:06:45 +0100,
Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> While the $val/$val2 values passed in from userspace are always >= 0
> integers, the limits of the control can be signed integers and the $min
> can be non-zero and less than zero. To correctly validate $val/$val2
> against platform_max, add the $min offset to val first.
>
> Fixes: 817f7c9335ec0 ("ASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw()")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Now I'm looking at this since I pulled Mark's PR, and noticed that
snd_soc_put_volsw_sx() may have a similar problem. Care to cover
that, too?
But, more reading the code, I suspect whether the function does work
correctly at all... How is the mask calculation done in that way?
unsigned int mask = (1U << (fls(min + max) - 1)) - 1;
What's the difference of this function with snd_soc_put_volsw()?
Furthermore, the mask calculation and usage in snd_soc_put_volsw()
isn't right, either, I'm afraid; if the range is [-10, 0], max=0, then
mask will 0, which will omit all values...
I guess we need to revisit those functions (or I need more coffee).
thanks,
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-23 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 13:06 [PATCH] ASoC: ops: Shift tested values in snd_soc_put_volsw() by +min Marek Vasut
2022-02-16 18:01 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-23 14:55 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2022-02-23 16:32 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-23 16:44 ` Takashi Iwai
2022-02-23 16:52 ` Marek Vasut
2022-05-16 23:53 ` Tan N.
2022-05-17 1:12 ` [PATCH] ASoC: ops: Fix the bounds checking in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx and snd_soc_put_xr_sx Tan Nayir
2022-05-17 13:04 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-17 14:25 ` Tan Nayır
2022-05-17 18:20 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-17 19:58 ` Tan Nayır
2022-05-18 12:07 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-18 23:56 ` Tan Nayır
2022-05-19 15:47 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hy221y6md.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox