public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>,
	 davem@davemloft.net,  kuba@kernel.org,  pabeni@redhat.com,
	 edumazet@google.com
Cc: dsahern@kernel.org,  kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,  willemb@google.com,
	 willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,  netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6] ipv6: flowlabel: enforce per-netns limit for unprivileged callers
Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 16:40:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.15a911d59823a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260502150918.4171847-1-maoyi.xie@ntu.edu.sg>

Maoyi Xie wrote:
> fl_size, fl_ht and ip6_fl_lock in net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c are file
> scope and shared across netns. mem_check() reads fl_size to decide
> whether to deny non-CAP_NET_ADMIN callers; capable() runs against
> init_user_ns, so an unprivileged user in any non-init userns can
> push fl_size past FL_MAX_SIZE - FL_MAX_SIZE/4 and starve every
> other unprivileged userns on the host.
> 
> Add struct netns_ipv6::flowlabel_count, bumped and decremented next
> to fl_size in fl_intern, ip6_fl_gc and ip6_fl_purge. The new field
> is placed in the existing 4-byte hole after ipmr_seq, so struct
> netns_ipv6 stays the same size on 64-bit builds.
> 
> Bump FL_MAX_SIZE from 4096 to 8192. It has been 4096 since the file
> was added; machines and connection counts have grown.
> 
> mem_check() folds an extra per-netns ceiling into the existing
> non-CAP_NET_ADMIN conditional. The ceiling is half of the total
> budget that unprivileged callers have ever been able to use, i.e.
> (FL_MAX_SIZE - FL_MAX_SIZE/4) / 2 = 3072 entries. With FL_MAX_SIZE
> doubled, this preserves the original per-user reach (~3K, what an
> unprivileged caller could already obtain before this change) while
> forcing an attacker to spread allocations across at least two
> netns to exhaust the global non-CAP_NET_ADMIN budget.
> 
> CAP_NET_ADMIN against init_user_ns still bypasses both caps.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+
> Signed-off-by: Maoyi Xie <maoyi.xie@ntu.edu.sg>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>

> ---
> v6 (this submission, addressing v5 review by Willem):
>     - Rebased onto current net (resolves the conflict on
>       include/net/netns/ipv6.h that v5 hit. ipmr_seq is now
>       atomic_t but remains 4 bytes, so flowlabel_count still
>       fills the 4-byte hole after it).
>     - Restored fl_free() to its original position in both
>       ip6_fl_gc() and ip6_fl_purge(). v5 had moved fl_free()
>       after the new atomic_dec() to avoid the use-after-free
>       on fl->fl_net. v6 instead caches fl->fl_net into a
>       local before fl_free() in ip6_fl_gc(), and uses the
>       net argument already in scope in ip6_fl_purge().
> v5: replaced the per-netns ceiling FL_MAX_SIZE/8 with the
>     computed unpriv_user_limit = (FL_MAX_SIZE - FL_MAX_SIZE/4)/2,
>     which evaluates to 3072. v4's FL_MAX_SIZE/8 = 1024 would
>     have reduced the per-user budget below the ~3K an
>     unprivileged caller could already obtain before any of
>     this work, defeating the reason FL_MAX_SIZE was doubled
>     in the first place.
> v4: addressed Willem's v3 review on netdev. Dropped the
>     flowlabel_has_excl cacheline argument in favour of "fills
>     the existing 4-byte hole after ipmr_seq", and reordered
>     atomic_dec(&...flowlabel_count) to sit immediately after
>     atomic_dec(&fl_size) in ip6_fl_gc and ip6_fl_purge.
> v3: addressed Willem's review on the private security@ thread.
>     Merged FL_MAX_SIZE doubling, dropped test data, moved
>     flowlabel_count near ipmr_seq, inlined fl->fl_net in
>     ip6_fl_gc.
> v2: per-netns counter + cap, sent to security@ as a 2-patch
>     series.
> v1: fix-shape sketch in original disclosure.
> 
>  include/net/netns/ipv6.h |  1 +
>  net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv6.h b/include/net/netns/ipv6.h
> index 499e42881..ef698f5fa 100644
> --- a/include/net/netns/ipv6.h
> +++ b/include/net/netns/ipv6.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct netns_ipv6 {
>  	struct fib_notifier_ops	*notifier_ops;
>  	struct fib_notifier_ops	*ip6mr_notifier_ops;
>  	atomic_t		ipmr_seq;
> +	atomic_t		flowlabel_count;
>  	struct {
>  		struct hlist_head head;
>  		spinlock_t	lock;
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> index c92f98c6f..28e43718d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>  /* FL hash table */
>  
>  #define FL_MAX_PER_SOCK	32
> -#define FL_MAX_SIZE	4096
> +#define FL_MAX_SIZE	8192
>  #define FL_HASH_MASK	255
>  #define FL_HASH(l)	(ntohl(l)&FL_HASH_MASK)
>  
> @@ -161,9 +161,12 @@ static void ip6_fl_gc(struct timer_list *unused)
>  					fl->expires = ttd;
>  				ttd = fl->expires;
>  				if (time_after_eq(now, ttd)) {
> +					struct net *net = fl->fl_net;
> +
>  					*flp = fl->next;
>  					fl_free(fl);
>  					atomic_dec(&fl_size);
> +					atomic_dec(&net->ipv6.flowlabel_count);
>  					continue;
>  				}
>  				if (!sched || time_before(ttd, sched))
> @@ -197,6 +200,7 @@ static void __net_exit ip6_fl_purge(struct net *net)
>  				*flp = fl->next;
>  				fl_free(fl);
>  				atomic_dec(&fl_size);
> +				atomic_dec(&net->ipv6.flowlabel_count);
>  				continue;
>  			}
>  			flp = &fl->next;
> @@ -245,6 +249,7 @@ static struct ip6_flowlabel *fl_intern(struct net *net,
>  	fl->next = fl_ht[FL_HASH(fl->label)];
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(fl_ht[FL_HASH(fl->label)], fl);
>  	atomic_inc(&fl_size);
> +	atomic_inc(&net->ipv6.flowlabel_count);
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&ip6_fl_lock);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	return NULL;
> @@ -464,6 +469,9 @@ fl_create(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct in6_flowlabel_req *freq,
>  
>  static int mem_check(struct sock *sk)
>  {
> +	const int unpriv_total_limit = FL_MAX_SIZE - (FL_MAX_SIZE / 4);
> +	const int unpriv_user_limit = unpriv_total_limit / 2;
> +	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
>  	int room = FL_MAX_SIZE - atomic_read(&fl_size);

Sashiko correctly points out that the existing fl_size and this new
test are racy.

fl_intern takes ip6_fl_lock not much later. Moving the tests inside
that critical section also avoids the need for atomic ops.

That can be a separate patch. Ideally that conversion happens before
adding this new field, so that it can be backported without conflicts.

Basically, move the spin_lock_bh(&ip6_sk_fl_lock) out of fl_intern
into its only caller ipv6_flowlabel_get, to also cover mem_check, and
converting fl_size to a regular int.

Let me know if you're up for that and adding it to this series, else I
can prepare it.

Does not look as impactful in practice, but it's still a small fix.

>  	struct ipv6_fl_socklist *sfl;
>  	int count = 0;
> @@ -478,7 +486,9 @@ static int mem_check(struct sock *sk)
>  
>  	if (room <= 0 ||
>  	    ((count >= FL_MAX_PER_SOCK ||
> -	      (count > 0 && room < FL_MAX_SIZE/2) || room < FL_MAX_SIZE/4) &&
> +	      (count > 0 && room < FL_MAX_SIZE/2) ||
> +	      room < FL_MAX_SIZE/4 ||
> +	      atomic_read(&net->ipv6.flowlabel_count) >= unpriv_user_limit) &&
>  	     !capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)))
>  		return -ENOBUFS;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-03 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-02 15:09 [PATCH net v6] ipv6: flowlabel: enforce per-netns limit for unprivileged callers Maoyi Xie
2026-05-02 16:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-03  5:47   ` Maoyi Xie
2026-05-03 20:40 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-05-03 20:43 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-05  5:55   ` Maoyi Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.15a911d59823a@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox