From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	LKML List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	torsten.hilbrich@secunet.com, Richard Jones <rjones@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Marcos Mello <marcosfrm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] block: fix infinite loop in __getblk_slow
References: <x49r4t2rul5.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
	<CA+5PVA6j+deqA9n7ZsZDcSsCKTvHs4B1QMfrL4KvHVWTC=dV7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:31:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CA+5PVA6j+deqA9n7ZsZDcSsCKTvHs4B1QMfrL4KvHVWTC=dV7A@mail.gmail.com>
	(Josh Boyer's message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:27:50 -0400")
Message-ID: <x49d34mrsy3.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Is this needed in addition to your earlier patch here:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1316228
>
> or is it a replacement for that?

Sorry for the confusion, it's a replacement for that patch.

Cheers,
Jeff