From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: sd: Optimal I/O size should be a multiple of physical block size
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:00:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1h8d4o2sa.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212212105.17522-1-martin.petersen@oracle.com> (Martin K. Petersen's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:21:05 -0500")
Christoph?
> It was reported that some devices report an OPTIMAL TRANSFER LENGTH of
> 0xFFFF blocks. That looks bogus, especially for a device with a
> 4096-byte physical block size.
>
> Ignore OPTIMAL TRANSFER LENGTH if it is not a multiple of the device's
> reported physical block size.
>
> To make the sanity checking conditionals more readable--and to
> facilitate printing warnings--relocate the checking to a helper
> function. No functional change aside from the printks.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199759
> Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - Added warnings as requested by hch
> - Moved the checks to a helper function
>
> Before:
>
> NAME ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA SCHED RQ-SIZE RA WSAME
> sda 0 4096 33553920 4096 512 0 mq-deadline 256 128 32M
>
> After:
>
> NAME ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA SCHED RQ-SIZE RA WSAME
> sda 0 4096 0 4096 512 0 mq-deadline 256 4096 32M
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 9aa409b38765..5dfe37b08d3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -3048,6 +3048,55 @@ static void sd_read_security(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
> sdkp->security = 1;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Determine the device's preferred I/O size for reads and writes
> + * unless the reported value is unreasonably small, large, not a
> + * multiple of the physical block size, or simply garbage.
> + */
> +static bool sd_validate_opt_xfer_size(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
> + unsigned int dev_max)
> +{
> + struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
> + unsigned int opt_xfer_bytes =
> + logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
> +
> + if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks > dev_max) {
> + sd_first_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp,
> + "Optimal transfer size %u logical blocks " \
> + "> dev_max (%u logical blocks)\n",
> + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks, dev_max);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks > SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS) {
> + sd_first_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp,
> + "Optimal transfer size %u logical blocks " \
> + "> sd driver limit (%u logical blocks)\n",
> + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks, SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (opt_xfer_bytes < PAGE_SIZE) {
> + sd_first_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp,
> + "Optimal transfer size %u bytes < " \
> + "PAGE_SIZE (%u bytes)\n",
> + opt_xfer_bytes, (unsigned int)PAGE_SIZE);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (opt_xfer_bytes & (sdkp->physical_block_size - 1)) {
> + sd_first_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp,
> + "Optimal transfer size %u bytes not a " \
> + "multiple of physical block size (%u bytes)\n",
> + opt_xfer_bytes, sdkp->physical_block_size);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + sd_first_printk(KERN_INFO, sdkp, "Optimal transfer size %u bytes\n",
> + opt_xfer_bytes);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * sd_revalidate_disk - called the first time a new disk is seen,
> * performs disk spin up, read_capacity, etc.
> @@ -3117,15 +3166,7 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> dev_max = min_not_zero(dev_max, sdkp->max_xfer_blocks);
> q->limits.max_dev_sectors = logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max);
>
> - /*
> - * Determine the device's preferred I/O size for reads and writes
> - * unless the reported value is unreasonably small, large, or
> - * garbage.
> - */
> - if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks &&
> - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max &&
> - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS &&
> - logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks) >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> + if (sd_validate_opt_xfer_size(sdkp, dev_max)) {
> q->limits.io_opt = logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
> rw_max = logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
> } else
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-16 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 23:41 [PATCH] scsi: sd: Optimal I/O size should be a multiple of physical block size Martin K. Petersen
2019-02-12 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-12 21:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Martin K. Petersen
2019-02-16 3:00 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2019-02-22 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1h8d4o2sa.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).