From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:57566 "EHLO
        aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751519AbeEADY4 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:24:56 -0400
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libata: blacklist Micron SSD
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
References: <20180429160138.11091-1-sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:24:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180429160138.11091-1-sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk> (Sudip
        Mukherjee's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:01:38 +0100")
Message-ID: <yq1r2mw83cu.fsf@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>


Sudip,

> v1: Only M500IT MU01 was blacklisted.
>
> v2: Whitelist M500IT BG02 and M500DC and then blacklist all other Micron. 

I think my preference would be to blacklist M500IT with the MU01
firmware (which Micron said was affected) and rely on the "Micron*"
fallthrough further down for the rest.

I have not gotten firm confirmation on ZRAT behavior so for now we
should probably just do:

+ { "Micron_M500IT_*", "MU01",	ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM, },

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering