RFC: using launchpad as a public issue tracker of tgt

RFC: using launchpad as a public issue tracker of tgt

[Hitoshi Mitake]

Hi tgt list,

It seems that tgt doesn't have a public issue tracker. I'd like to
propose laucnhpad for this purpose:
https://launchpad.net/tgt-project

I think we should have a place for correcting and maintaining issues.
It would make grasping the status of development easier. I'd like to
hear your comments.

Thanks,
Hitoshi

Re: RFC: using launchpad as a public issue tracker of tgt

[Turbo Fredriksson]

On Apr 17, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:

> It seems that tgt doesn't have a public issue tracker. I'd like to
> propose laucnhpad for this purpose:
> https://launchpad.net/tgt-project

DISCLAIMER
Having absolutly nothing to do with the project, other than a user.
DISCLAIMER


I'd like to say that launchpad sucks. It's ugly, cumbersome and
an irritant to use. It doesn't do anything that GitHub isn't
already doing much better and simpler.

Enabling the issue tracker in the GitHub repo is just two clicks
away (literally), so there's absolutly no point in adding an external
tracker.

It (Launchpad) is also a real mess to setup and administrate (at
least if using it on your own servers).
--
God gave man both a penis and a brain,
but unfortunately not enough blood supply
to run both at the same time.
- R. Williams

Re: RFC: using launchpad as a public issue tracker of tgt

[Hitoshi Mitake]

At Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:07:57 +0200,
Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> 
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> 
> > It seems that tgt doesn't have a public issue tracker. I'd like to
> > propose laucnhpad for this purpose:
> > https://launchpad.net/tgt-project
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> Having absolutly nothing to do with the project, other than a user.
> DISCLAIMER
> 
> 
> I'd like to say that launchpad sucks. It's ugly, cumbersome and
> an irritant to use. It doesn't do anything that GitHub isn't
> already doing much better and simpler.
> 
> Enabling the issue tracker in the GitHub repo is just two clicks
> away (literally), so there's absolutly no point in adding an external
> tracker.

I think using the issue tracker of github isn't a good idea. Because
tgt is using github just as git repository. The development is based
on this mailing list. If we start to use the isse tracker of github,
other developers will start to send pull requests instead of patch to
the list.

> 
> It (Launchpad) is also a real mess to setup and administrate (at
> least if using it on your own servers).

And I cannot see ugly points of launchpad (and we can use public
server). Which part of launchpad do you dislike?

Thanks,
Hitoshi