From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oo1-f69.google.com (mail-oo1-f69.google.com [209.85.161.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6EF4299949 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 13:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.69 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768311294; cv=none; b=Mue6+Nx0YBdZ2WeJlk6G+X5t8PwqthS6oznrPcP51aiAfJ7H+isoh39gbhmpTctVsNR0/6ZGVYB2tfNHQPk0/u2HjaEl7VjCAvQc/Lhz196yC1wFMPV6tstF68Tnb7b5vceurH2LP1saaWVZktQYC79sLjoAbT3/WuooCSaYXq4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768311294; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dvEzE81V3oBhCAUVKufQNSSJ6ec8XHVImfDiIZC7vpA=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=DiNI/BawZQyKEn60lKN77ldz6ojDhZbNIhM7gBS7IoUGcyi3xKkcLkPN1zl1R/hoGzg3MraL9Cg7NqAFsJuUTEt893g4aNkwdIrS7RLK9YyOqiBdSyLL/e7o98xfr8FUYYBlIpwjHbh/R4mH+ZvS1S5fJpeaq1Al6tNFD1GVZGU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.69 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: by mail-oo1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-65f6c6e6c3fso10396828eaf.2 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 05:34:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768311292; x=1768916092; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Z/0HhOKGepVKraOdP1IRBIOygWDOmmd7O2EvJVKHWtU=; b=T9xF+Sr8LypZYNl3AwWWzuAKsILkzk9yg0dG2cJ8is0X7O8rBOsbUV5SdmW5WGgS7m /819GF2/tIG0ZOT7Xg8szNpi7h1gkIwkhbaezvLQ5XMmbQ3VyP3qDzW7ySMQTzsPg6W4 wyMRFRMVj+1ZtrGOknbyRMmSI15Gg1X97gaSehD/QAbPTkykqJxtQcSoMrpvzDAsACMk g5Dgg2KQ4d2/OtwDn+N7qxltznZYemSs5xmwKNnDck24BQuYVwNAeE8Ax6KzLlQ81jv0 d50EEhd/SGtOeo5dArkeYe+Y7QlFldB82yReB67x4XVOkgDv5eEZBcJsNxpZYPhmwvl9 5Wtg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwjHgPO3mU4VxlgcuzORmhhjHViWUOcN4b+c2cTNIV+L6taSVZ0 xW5HroMPNsO6N5zCu7iov4wrk5kw3rQwRgHTy7AKxO2fiKNYAsKoRSdlQtFscC/YoTVvhBdo32E qxtxVrq0Aw0lj2pb0vcYaVH+HZFnu/UUH45dUf8m8SDlDXf7C/MuNTxS9Dfs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFV1IC/ke6V+LTVRQvb9HouZy3qfgaW6iCOzvWRqh3Oh6vSJ+YOrkXOTB+42EiZjXxCJOkSErbQ6TKieM1qfaZFXr9EVcbQ Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: syzbot@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:2289:b0:65f:6b62:1b6f with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-65f6b622261mr6593179eaf.79.1768311291908; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 05:34:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 05:34:51 -0800 X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <696649fb.050a0220.3be5c5.0016.GAE@google.com> Subject: [moderation/CI] Re: BPF-based NUMA balancing From: syzbot ci To: syzkaller-upstream-moderation@googlegroups.com Cc: syzbot@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable syzbot ci has tested the following series [v1] BPF-based NUMA balancing https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260113121238.11300-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/3] sched: add helpers for numa balancing * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/3] mm: add support for bpf based numa balancing * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/3] mm: set numa balancing hot threshold with bpf and found the following issue: kernel build error Full report is available here: https://ci.syzbot.org/series/63489828-86b0-4cf0-b097-51d3db6c9ba2 *** kernel build error tree: bpf-next URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf= -next.git base: 9c1a3525fd64839d71e0c1a21170003a4621e6e8 arch: amd64 compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251202083448+f68f64eb8130-1~exp= 1~20251202083504.46), Debian LLD 21.1.8 config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/763a3f6b-2e7b-4dda-81ae-cef10b6e332= 7/config mm/bpf_numa_balancing.c:151:10: error: call to undeclared function 'mem_cgr= oup_get_from_ino'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function decla= rations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] mm/bpf_numa_balancing.c:151:8: error: incompatible integer to pointer conve= rsion assigning to 'struct mem_cgroup *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion] mm/bpf_numa_balancing.c:177:10: error: call to undeclared function 'mem_cgr= oup_get_from_ino'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function decla= rations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] mm/bpf_numa_balancing.c:177:8: error: incompatible integer to pointer conve= rsion assigning to 'struct mem_cgroup *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion] mm/bpf_numa_balancing.c:197:10: error: call to undeclared function 'mem_cgr= oup_get_from_ino'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function decla= rations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] mm/bpf_numa_balancing.c:197:8: error: incompatible integer to pointer conve= rsion assigning to 'struct mem_cgroup *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion] *** If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com. The email will later be sent to: [akpm@linux-foundation.org andrii@kernel.org ast@kernel.org bpf@vger.kernel= .org daniel@iogearbox.net inwardvessel@gmail.com laoar.shao@gmail.com linux= -mm@kvack.org mkoutny@suse.com roman.gushchin@linux.dev shakeel.butt@linux.= dev yu.c.chen@intel.com zhao1.liu@intel.com] If the report looks fine to you, reply with: #syz upstream If the report is a false positive, reply with #syz invalid