[moderation/CI] Re: mm/readahead: batch folio insertion to improve performance

[moderation/CI] Re: mm/readahead: batch folio insertion to improve performance

[syzbot ci]

syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v1] mm/readahead: batch folio insertion to improve performance
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260119065027.918085-1-zhiguo.zhou@intel.com
* [PATCH 1/2] mm/filemap: refactor __filemap_add_folio to separate critical section
* [PATCH 2/2] mm/readahead: batch folio insertion to improve performance

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/18c2323b-a79e-49af-b87d-c7efb03f88c2

***

kernel build error

tree:      mm-new
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git
base:      ab43a28fc5b9faf53aa9e3210dcc0b5a0842e241
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/4578b5ab-2df7-4d96-b41a-c357791c029f/config

mm/filemap.c:861:2: error: member reference type 'spinlock_t' (aka 'struct spinlock') is not a pointer; did you mean to use '.'?
mm/filemap.c:861:2: error: cannot take the address of an rvalue of type 'struct lockdep_map'
mm/filemap.c:941:3: error: member reference type 'spinlock_t' (aka 'struct spinlock') is not a pointer; did you mean to use '.'?
mm/filemap.c:941:3: error: cannot take the address of an rvalue of type 'struct lockdep_map'
mm/filemap.c:944:3: error: member reference type 'spinlock_t' (aka 'struct spinlock') is not a pointer; did you mean to use '.'?
mm/filemap.c:944:3: error: cannot take the address of an rvalue of type 'struct lockdep_map'

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

The email will later be sent to:
[akpm@linux-foundation.org david@kernel.org gang.deng@intel.com liam.howlett@oracle.com linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org linux-mm@kvack.org lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com mhocko@suse.com muchun.song@linux.dev osalvador@suse.de rppt@kernel.org surenb@google.com tianyou.li@intel.com tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com vbabka@suse.cz willy@infradead.org zhiguo.zhou@intel.com]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid