From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oo1-f71.google.com (mail-oo1-f71.google.com [209.85.161.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCCF73A3814 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773181615; cv=none; b=rwGxPcOLa0/rSbOFoxY7sRfnVH37zBH9Jf9jHDRTpFMV5UIvIHQrByZMX2lptSg97beux/Umg40Pyoooistw/Rs77z1s0WJa85ybwu2nygEv5nnDTmxAzGxBR6Tv2rorLg6fOuDFKSoOFFmDeMzMx9pOXbjYd16HeFLt91XppXU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773181615; c=relaxed/simple; bh=14u/cddA9VTuYGZuFq/0T0QNnb0Xf/bMzTVl7id0p8k=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=uM2Oug9Amu9Lxbcjp8dB1WgcewlEeFqTrC7w+icGusr62ZE9bfHQDdSdU5sV4I63mSgEV44YbtIXa+gJthdEMu/FcdHmu5CZABw5IqxPU5Gw8ULswONK8LbdZmOYjyr4S7FME31SGdigK4jRDHPXplSlREMVc0lxmjYPP7j8WrU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: by mail-oo1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-67bb2273d42so37377564eaf.0 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:26:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1773181613; x=1773786413; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yxJ+GtEntpiyHLIPOmig0EgfzRlPUoExdeOVSi1/Qn4=; b=SJgAac/ku2W9SGxzRv05DigK1Ef93pZaXcTBrN2tn81bP/1lK6rgjNbRPOWXAgTYP1 D93c+aM7O09boLVOGGLl+du5CeCkDGAKKjOhIJbn8ELnyp1uWaFw5J2X7t6qWzvvwXqP gNfzYJrkohJ59I+G06dqgAMSTElqoHHPMn6iJCMPxCwNhES+vD0VT+wZ2/1I4jF8p3hN WLR1AfJL4UVJAwTYXeyPbrovZT87fljC0/lFpZ6Ny1iP2quyNWwntGh536ckMWbbKYE8 179TfpeeXyay4OYi25wwKhK5yPrpp4TTzYhJ+/saNSQOpegU8b50xTnf282qnTwyi8MW oE5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyB1KPGXrsioUxa+6YyfKMXkYLyBu3zw2CwCt/qDq6Lxmy4WIJG QuCHhHIF0cQ7hFPr6fWL3z2/a8ECM5W4aZ0orBW2EAF+dOWYpblkiBT46uKqxEVfBbmj9mEQuCX XQqnn4TnycyjyTIJEzG5vtxz4r2pN8wEfI+yxv7dHFLqp6UIzFu+kVSpswDE= Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: syzbot@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:f008:b0:67b:a4fa:79f with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-67bc89e60c2mr336095eaf.47.1773181612877; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:26:52 -0700 X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <69b09aac.050a0220.8df7.09d4.GAE@google.com> Subject: [moderation/CI] Re: xsk: use __xsk_rcv_zc_safe for ZC multi-buffer Rx processing From: syzbot ci To: syzkaller-upstream-moderation@googlegroups.com Cc: syzbot@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" syzbot ci has tested the following series [v1] xsk: use __xsk_rcv_zc_safe for ZC multi-buffer Rx processing https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260310133024.422464-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com * [PATCH net-next] xsk: use __xsk_rcv_zc_safe for ZC multi-buffer Rx processing and found the following issue: kernel build error Full report is available here: https://ci.syzbot.org/series/d5f74520-c50b-42ac-a80a-e526bf664046 *** kernel build error tree: net-next URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git base: 05e059510edf7b6101ff85db2a2e2d1b6f31ee6d arch: amd64 compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8 config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/db23840f-4cb3-44bd-887a-2f0b7d74f703/config net/xdp/xsk.c:188:2: error: call to undeclared function '__xsk_rcv_zc_safe'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] *** If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com. The email will later be sent to: [bpf@vger.kernel.org horms@kernel.org kuba@kernel.org maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com magnus.karlsson@intel.com netdev@vger.kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com stfomichev@gmail.com] If the report looks fine to you, reply with: #syz upstream If the report is a false positive, reply with #syz invalid