[moderation/CI] Re: bpf: Remove inclusions of crypto/sha1.h

[syzbot ci <syzbot+cicc9d4ccd6ccced34@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>]

syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v2] bpf: Remove inclusions of crypto/sha1.h
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260314210810.67348-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
* [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Remove inclusions of crypto/sha1.h

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/38f41420-5e88-492b-9239-7c260178aa25

***

kernel build error

tree:      torvalds
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
base:      1c9982b4961334c1edb0745a04cabd34bc2de675
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/b5327796-0a46-46fc-a192-f0dbd20d9047/config

net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3341:25: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct sha1_ctx'
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3344:13: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE'
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3369:2: error: call to undeclared function 'sha1_init'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3378:2: error: call to undeclared function 'sha1_update'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

The email will later be sent to:
[andrii@kernel.org ast@kernel.org bpf@vger.kernel.org daniel@iogearbox.net ebiggers@kernel.org eddyz87@gmail.com haoluo@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev sdf@fomichev.me song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid